could not find post
As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.
You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022)
x
05-07-2015, 01:20 AM
It is absolutely fear-drenched. If one compares the tone of Ra/Quo messages with this, the difference becomes blatantly obvious.
Quote:Finally, the confederation sent a man known as Muhammad to your peoples as the final messenger of theWhat is it the kids say these days? "LOL", is it?
05-07-2015, 06:40 AM
Ahh, you see, you guys are still stuck with Ra's outdated intellect. As things have evolved far more complex and even corrupt in their own way then they have been back then.
05-07-2015, 07:24 AM
Yet Q'uo never even remotely touched on such fear mongering and they were channeled all the way up until 2011 I believe so I'd hardly call it outdated.
The confederation members all explicitly stated time and time again that such specifics are never given due to the probability vortex which means it may not happen. They never allowed such info to be relayed because the authenticity of the material would come into question had we gone on another path. Only those of a negative nature relay such fear mongering of such specifics. The only entity that was channeled and even came close was Hatton during the early years of their channelings and this was only about earth changes due to harvest. Not some menevolent race bent on slavery. It just reeks of fear. But you have every right to believe what you will and I accept that ![]()
05-07-2015, 09:29 AM
05-07-2015, 10:44 AM
It calls the luciferians "challengers of the infinite creator". Negative entities wish to be misunderstood. All is one and as such they are portions of the infinite creator and surely not challengers of it. Anything that pictures them as the devil is usally of them.
05-07-2015, 10:53 AM
You are correct in your understanding of this notion, although i do agree all is one, one must indulge in the distortion of this illusion in order to discuss the illusion. So can we please stop with the whole all is one thing and look at things through an actual view point instead of being lazy and simply stating all is one? Cmon guys, have an identity, have a perspective.
05-07-2015, 11:10 AM
(05-07-2015, 09:29 AM)outerheaven Wrote:(05-07-2015, 06:40 AM)PsyOil Wrote: Ahh, you see, you guys are still stuck with Ra's outdated intellect. As things have evolved far more complex and even corrupt in their own way then they have been back then. Timeless, indeed. But you must understand the limitations Ra had while channeling his message. As he was limited to the intellect of the instrument through which he was transmitting the message. Sort of a filter, you could say.
I do not think of it as lazy. Other-selves are there to reflect portions of the creator to be accepted and understood by self. They are not "alien" to you, they are exactly "you" that went through their path.
As I said those that wishes not for negative entities to be understood and accepted is usually negative entities themselves. I call them negative entities to partake in the illusion else I would use "those you call negative entities".
05-07-2015, 11:37 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-07-2015, 11:58 AM by outerheaven.)
(05-07-2015, 11:10 AM)PsyOil Wrote: Timeless, indeed. But you must understand the limitations Ra had while channeling his message. As he was limited to the intellect of the instrument through which he was transmitting the message. Sort of a filter, you could say. So you're saying that because Carla wanted to see all as one, and offer her love to all, she channeled a message that was filtered through that paradigm. You are then implying that this is problematic. You suggest that I should choose to engage in the illusion of separation, so I can "have an identity" or "a perspective"? I think we just might have different values here, a different understanding of what these things mean. I have already experienced viewing the world with fear, or anger, or suspicion. To step back into that mentality would be, to me, a tremendous step backwards personally. (I am not claiming to be above, or superior in any way, anyone who does see the world in that way. It's just not my path any longer.) I have put in a tremendous effort to become more loving and accepting. I have a lot more love and happiness in my life now than before. Messages of fear and hatred and conspiracies etc do not have the ring of truth to me. I understand you might see this as lazy or unintellectual or whatever -- but that's cool. Different paths. Godspeed on yours.
05-07-2015, 11:38 AM
Despite what I said, I've enjoyed the reading. Just saying that negative entities wishes to be misunderstood and not accepted as part of the whole.
05-07-2015, 11:47 AM
All I can say is I don't resonate with this material at all.
05-07-2015, 01:45 PM
I read through this at about 80% attention level and it is very negatively influenced. If this really was, as implied, the attempt at channeling a very specific being (Muhammad) by a solo entity after having ingested psilocybin and desiring to contact the CIA, there is no wonder why. Here are some points:
Quote:The This forum in and of itself is proof that the message from Ra was hardly ignored. These lines were followed by: Quote:It is up to you, my friends over at the CIA to help me deliver the message of El oh el. Session 1: Quote:Ra: The few whom you will illuminate by sharing your light are far more than enough reason for the greatest possible effort. To serve one is to serve all. The Law of One has not been ignored. Quote:Anyways.. After the egoic upraise of the Denisova hominins of Europe, man began to take form of their Can you imagine the Confederation exhibiting outrage? Just a question... Quote:Finally, the confederation sent a man known as Muhammad to your peoples as the final messenger of the The final messenger of the Law of One? Really? This letter is concluded with: Quote:Well one possibility that Not quite vague threats and again, as Muhammad, is stating that he is the final/apparently only messenger of the Law of One. Quote:The infinite creator did not want any physical evidence of Muhammads existence, by Muhammad, as someone The infinite creator did not want?? What does that mean? Is this another repeat of "do not draw me heathens"? Reasoning: because a person somewhere desired to misquote him? And this: Quote:More specifically, he Annunaki humanoids. As the The Creator did not want, but thou shall not is against free will. Hmm. Followed up with: Quote:The confederation was outraged by the acts carried out by the challengers of the infinite creator More Confederation outrage because... people were using free will? Too many contradictions to take it seriously. Not to mention that the majority of the writing is about Earth history and past civilizations. Purely transient material per Ra.
05-08-2015, 01:57 AM
Yeah, sorry, I don't buy much/any of this. It's covered in negative terminology, and most of the information it offers - even if it were true- is basically useless trivia that has nothing to do with today's world or the upcoming harvest.
Also, I find it very hard to reconcile his claims about Christopher Columbus being enlightened when his colonies in the New World were ruled over tyrannically. He brutalized the natives so thoroughly that even his own bosses back in Spain were appalled by his actions. At one point he ended up in prison and came within an inch of having his lands and titles stripped specifically because of his brutal leadership. (nor were his sons much better) But in the meantime, Jesus was a pervert who molested his mother? Really?? I find very little reason to put much stock in this, or to hear more about what this supposed Muhammed thinks. I really don't find his claims believable and, honestly, this seems more like celestial muckraking. It creates uncertainty and confusion, rather than clarity. THAT, is feel, is one of the truest indicators of a fundamentally negative message. |
|