Is the Law of One harmonious with the Abrahamic faiths?

[Confused]

...because nobody wants to look like a fool!

Sorry, I could not resist searching for the word, fool, at the lawofone.info site

67.30 Questioner: In that case, continue.

Ra: I am Ra. Perhaps the first item which we shall address is the concept of the spirit used as a shuttle between the roots and the trunk of mind. This is a misapprehension and we shall allow the questioner to consider the function of the spirit further, for in working with the mind we are working within one complex and have not yet attempted to penetrate intelligent infinity. It is well said that archetypes are portions of the One Infinite Creator or aspects of its face. It is, however, far better to realize that the archetypes, while constant in the complex of generative energies offered, do not give the same yield of these complexes to any two seekers. Each seeker will experience each archetype in the characteristics within the complex of the archetype which are most important to it. An example of this would be the observation of the questioner that the Fool is described in such and such a way. One great aspect of this archetype is the aspect of faith, the walking into space without regard for what is to come next. This is, of course, foolish but is part of the characteristic of the spiritual neophyte. That this aspect was not seen may be pondered by the questioner. At this time we shall again request that the query be restated at the next working and we shall at this time cease using this instrument. Before we leave may we ask if there may be any short questions?

[Ankh]

In Sweeden, there is this popular idea called "Jantelagen" (yontay loggen) which means "The Law of Jante" (not related to Law of One ). Jante is the typical Swede. Jante doesn't do anything that would make him stand out too much, be too "loud" or draw too much attention to himself. All should remember to be like Jante, because nobody wants to look like a fool!

Also, in Sweden, each time we see loud people waving their hands and take room all over the street, we usually guess that it's American turists. And in most cases we are usually right!

But I did experience the loudness of an yankee (who is an opposite of a jante) once in a restaurant which I was visiting with an American. "It's rediculous!!" he said very loud when finding out that doggy bags are not common in Swedish restaurants!

[Aaron]

In Sweeden, there is this popular idea called "Jantelagen" (yontay loggen) which means "The Law of Jante" (not related to Law of One ). Jante is the typical Swede. Jante doesn't do anything that would make him stand out too much, be too "loud" or draw too much attention to himself. All should remember to be like Jante, because nobody wants to look like a fool!

Also, in Sweden, each time we see loud people waving their hands and take room all over the street, we usually guess that it's American turists. And in most cases we are usually right!

But I did experience the loudness of an yankee (who is an opposite of a jante) once in a restaurant which I was visiting with an American. "It's rediculous!!" he said very loud when finding out that doggy bags are not common in Swedish restaurants!

Why waste the food?!?!

[Confused]

Also, in Sweden, each time we see loud people waving their hands and take room all over the street, we usually guess that it's American turists. And in most cases we are usually right!

But I did experience the loudness of an yankee (who is an opposite of a jante) once in a restaurant which I was visiting with an American. "It's rediculous!!" he said very loud when finding out that doggy bags are not common in Swedish restaurants!

OK, the Swedes are here to explain themselves better

Since I started speaking about the Swedes, I will have to cede space to the very experts themselves, Ankh and Aaron

[Tenet Nosce]

http://youtu.be/TarH1yb2GXY?t=5m39s This kind of what you mean?

Not unlike that.

---

Yes, compatible with the Law of One, because everything is contained in the Law of One.

When you say Law of One here, are you referring to the Ra Material as a whole. Or just the Law of One?

Considering the material as a whole, I would say yes they are compatible because it is not necessary to have the philosophy correct in order to polarize. It can be done quite unconsciously- and by those on any religious path, or even atheists!

But when we go bone-to-bone with the Law of One (short version) as a statement of cosmology- I don't see how it can be reconciled with a view that says there are two fundamental forces in the universe that cannot, themselves, be reconciled. Do you see a way to harmonize these?

[Cyan]

Someone here has said to me that I'm the one who is many.

http://bible.cc/mark/5-9.htm this I'm reminded of by that.

So not entirely sure how in line with abrahamics the concept of a single entity splitting into many is. Then again, that passage is clearly a social memory complex story. Dunno.