Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Community Olio threat of large quake on horizon

    Thread: threat of large quake on horizon


    Oceania Away

    Account Closed
    Posts: 4,006
    Threads: 56
    Joined: May 2011
    #31
    07-12-2011, 01:23 PM
    didn't Ra say that?

      •
    3DMonkey

    Guest
     
    #32
    07-12-2011, 01:40 PM
    (07-11-2011, 08:52 PM)zenmaster Wrote:
    (07-11-2011, 08:48 PM)unity100 Wrote: so you are treating prediction of a large quake in a fault zone, after many or prominent volcanoes in that zone have activated, or after similar strong geological pointers, as some worthless vague prediction.
    It's irresponsible to create open ended predictions of large earthquakes, especially if you have no business whatsoever doing it.
    teeter-totter

    I'm irresponsible for predicting, I'm irresponsible for buying your prediction, teeter-totter

    I like data. Give me data, and I'll wait to see what more data comes to fill it in.
    (07-12-2011, 01:23 PM)Oceania Wrote: didn't Ra say that?
    Could you elaborate, please? [Image: smileyvault-rulez.gif]


    Ra did mention inconveniences that "will cause your planetary sphere to have some ruptures in its outer garment" during transition into fourth density. http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?sea...&ss=1&sc=1

    According to 6:17, we are at the approximate end of the "unabated" inconveniences time frame. The opposite of unabated, is become less intense. More synonyms: die down/away/out, lessen, ease (off), let up,decrease, diminish, moderate, decline, fade, dwindle, recede, tail off,peter out, taper off, wane, ebb, weaken, come to an end;.

      •
    Oceania Away

    Account Closed
    Posts: 4,006
    Threads: 56
    Joined: May 2011
    #33
    07-12-2011, 02:25 PM
    Ra said something about earthquakes ending at 2012.

      •
    Monica (Offline)

    Account Closed
    Posts: 7,043
    Threads: 151
    Joined: Dec 2008
    #34
    07-12-2011, 03:22 PM
    (07-11-2011, 08:52 PM)zenmaster Wrote: It's irresponsible to create open ended predictions of large earthquakes, especially if you have no business whatsoever doing it.

    Recognizing that some zones are more prone to earthquakes isn't an 'open-ended prediction.' Even mainstream geologists don't say "if" an earthquake will occur in some hot zones like California, but "when" it will happen. They say it's long overdue. That's isn't irresponsible; that's just analyzing data.

    It would be irresponsible to not report the data analysis, just as it would be irresponsible to not tell residents that a hurricane is on the way.


      •
    zenmaster (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 5,541
    Threads: 132
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #35
    07-12-2011, 08:24 PM
    (07-12-2011, 03:22 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote:
    (07-11-2011, 08:52 PM)zenmaster Wrote: It's irresponsible to create open ended predictions of large earthquakes, especially if you have no business whatsoever doing it.
    Recognizing that some zones are more prone to earthquakes isn't an 'open-ended prediction.'
    That true, and also obvious. I was referring to "threat of a large quake on the horizon". Yes, it's irresponsible to create open-ended predictions like that.

      •
    βαθμιαίος (Offline)

    Doughty Seeker
    Posts: 1,758
    Threads: 33
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #36
    07-12-2011, 08:42 PM (This post was last modified: 07-12-2011, 08:44 PM by βαθμιαίος.)
    (07-10-2011, 06:50 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote: 92.33 Questioner: The protection here seems to be depicted as being on the right-hand side but not the left. Would this indicate that there is protection for the positive path but not for the negative?
    Ra: I am Ra. You perceive correctly an inborn bias offering to the seeing eye and listing ear information concerning the choice of the more efficient polarity.

    94.18 Questioner: It would seem to me, from the configuration of this male entity in Card Number Four, who looks to the left with the right foot pointed to the left, that this card would indicate you must be in a defensive position with respect to the left-hand path, but there is no need to concern yourself about protection with respect to the right-hand path. Would Ra comment on that?
    Ra: I am Ra. Again, this is not the suggestion we wished to offer by constructing this image. However, the perception cannot be said to be incorrect.

    Category: Tarot: Experience of the Mind

    95.26 Questioner: Am I to understand, then, that there is no protection at all if the Experience of the Mind has chosen the left-hand path and that path is traveled? All random catalyst may affect the negatively polarized individual as a function of the statistical nature of the random catalyst. Is this correct?
    Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. You may note some of those of your peoples which, at this space/time nexus, seek places of survival. This is due to the lack of protection when service to self is invoked.

    The protection isn't so much from physical catalyst as it is from negative interpretations of that catalyst:

    Quote:95.24 Questioner: From that statement I interpret the following. If the Experience of the Mind has sufficiently chosen the right-hand path, and as total purity is approached in the choosing of the right-hand path, then total imperviousness from the effect of the left-hand catalyst is also approached. Is this correct?

    Ra: I am Ra. This is exquisitely perceptive. The seeker which has purely chosen the service-to-others path shall certainly not have a variant apparent incarnational experience. There is no outward shelter in your illusion from the gusts, flurries, and blizzards of quick and cruel catalyst.

    However, to the pure, all that is encountered speaks of the love and the light of the One Infinite Creator. The cruelest blow is seen with an ambiance of challenges offered and opportunities to come. Thusly, the great pitch of light is held high above such an one so that all interpretation may be seen to be protected by light.

      •
    unity100 (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 4,502
    Threads: 152
    Joined: May 2010
    #37
    07-13-2011, 10:26 AM
    (07-12-2011, 08:24 PM)zenmaster Wrote:
    (07-12-2011, 03:22 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote:
    (07-11-2011, 08:52 PM)zenmaster Wrote: It's irresponsible to create open ended predictions of large earthquakes, especially if you have no business whatsoever doing it.
    Recognizing that some zones are more prone to earthquakes isn't an 'open-ended prediction.'
    That true, and also obvious. I was referring to "threat of a large quake on the horizon". Yes, it's irresponsible to create open-ended predictions like that.

    yes, the threat of a large quake is on the horizon in many parts of the world, and probably 80% of those places are doing nothing.

    japanese were preparing. they still got over a 9 scale quake and a tsnami well.

    there are 2-4 parts of the world which is in for a megaquake at any given time, yet, noone is doing anything.

    there comes the value of 'open ended predictions'. they may cause people to prepare.

      •
    3DMonkey

    Guest
     
    #38
    07-13-2011, 11:34 AM
    "noone is doing anything"
    "doing nothing"

    that's more depressing than reading a threat of a quake.

      •
    Oceania Away

    Account Closed
    Posts: 4,006
    Threads: 56
    Joined: May 2011
    #39
    07-13-2011, 11:44 AM
    *hugs* try not to get depressed!
    [+] The following 1 member thanked thanked Oceania for this post:1 member thanked Oceania for this post
      • kycahi
    Bring4th_Steve (Offline)

    Web Guy Emeritus
    Posts: 588
    Threads: 35
    Joined: Aug 2008
    #40
    07-13-2011, 02:41 PM (This post was last modified: 07-13-2011, 02:44 PM by Bring4th_Steve.)
    I agree with Zen in that those who declare that the next big one is due to hit sometime soon, due to scientific observation/speculation, is a bit "fear mongerish".

    I happen to be of the mind-set that I'll be where I have agreed to be, per my pre-incarnational agreement. If I am to be a part of the harvest/ascension, then I really do not need to worry about when or where the next big one is going to hit.

    Also, I would not rely on "when" earthquakes are going to end. We have no concrete evidence as to when 4th density is going to finish coming into existence. Or, to phrase it another way, we do not know when 3rd density is going to phase out completely. According to the LOO books, it could be a 300 year period, with quake activity becoming less and less intense as the denser energies are shed and replaced with higher vibrating energies of 4th density.

    Wouldn't you rather just trust in yourself, and instead of worrying, just intend for yourself to be safe and protected from any subsequent planetary changes, in whatever form they come in?
    [+] The following 1 member thanked thanked Bring4th_Steve for this post:1 member thanked Bring4th_Steve for this post
      • Aaron
    Raman

    Guest
     
    #41
    07-13-2011, 07:39 PM
    This is a mixed harvest.

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

    Pages (2): « Previous 1 2



    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode