Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Science & Technology Why Einstein will never be wrong

    Thread: Why Einstein will never be wrong


    Parsons (Offline)

    Citizen of Eternity
    Posts: 2,857
    Threads: 84
    Joined: Nov 2011
    #31
    01-20-2014, 08:25 PM
    Anka claims his channeling is not conscious; that he isn't aware of what Bashar says. So the bottom line is you simply believe in Carla's non-concious channeling of Ra and don't believe Anka's same type of channeling.
    [+] The following 1 member thanked thanked Parsons for this post:1 member thanked Parsons for this post
      • Rake
    Spaced (Offline)

    Dark Star
    Posts: 2,702
    Threads: 61
    Joined: Jul 2012
    #32
    01-20-2014, 08:48 PM
    I don't think this thread really has anything to do with Anka and has a lot more to do with the development of scientific theories. Smile

      •
    zenmaster (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 5,541
    Threads: 132
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #33
    01-20-2014, 08:54 PM
    Lol, just can't let it go can't ya. Again, this thread is about theories, not ideas stuck perpetually in the mode of vauge intuitive guesses, notions and signposts. As anectodally meaningful and provacative as they may happen to be Parsons. You know, most scientists start with intuition but they purposefully don't stay there in order to actually develop their ideas to expand real knowledge. Could it be that the reason there is no free energy device because it's a difficult scientific problem yet to solve, or simply that we just haven't understood "Bashar's" philosophical principles and advice? The honest approach to living here responsibily vs the one of whim, conspiracy, and entertainment.

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

    Pages (2): « Previous 1 2



    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode