divinecosmos hacked again

[Ocean]

what the heck is going on? again? is the chinese purse salesmen?

---

oops i think i should have put this in olio. sorry mods. can you move it or delete it?

[Derek]

Obviously at least a psychic attack, if not more than that.

[Ocean]

thanks mods.

a psychic attack?

[Derek]

thanks mods.

a psychic attack?

Negative greeting.

[Ocean]

oic. it's just weird.

[Bring4th_Austin]

I do wonder to myself why someone would be attacking David Wilcock's website. Why sort of intentions would someone have removing this content from viewers?

Related topic for discussion: does the fact that David Wilcock is now obviously a target for someone in any way imply validation for his information?

[Ocean]

i dunno, can't negative greeting just be innocent purse and watch salesmen?

[Derek]

That's what I thought at first, but twice in a row is too much of a coincidence imo.

[Ocean]

that's what i thought too. purse and watch salesmen can't be that adamant.

[yossarian]

If the PTB wanted to shut down that site, it would be trivial. They could pretty much do it at will. Depending on the way the technology is setup they could even possibly reach the backups.

Obviously, this isn't proof. We won't know till we know. I'm just saying - a single small website like DC has no technology-based defence against the CIA/NSA.

Are they taking it down to coincide with the recent earthquake, ensuring control of the public message? Maybe. We all know that David Wilcock supports Benjamin Fulford, and Fulford obviously believes this was due to HAARP. If the HAARP message is true and gains traction, that could be a really big deal.

[zenmaster]

Obviously at least a psychic attack, if not more than that.

Are you joking?

[Ocean]

i don't trust fulford's views, some of the stuff he says i think is pretty extreme.

i dunno what is going on, it's just weird it's happening so often. it's such a nice place.

[NegaNova]

Damn those Chinese watch and purse salesmen! You've hacked our website for the last time!

[Ocean]

lol! i know it's not cool his site got hacked but when i read that about the people selling purses i just had to laugh, it's so absurd. here we have this amazing site and these people wanna sell purses and don't even care!

[NegaNova]

Well... unless they're psychic chinese watch and purse salesmen... bent on world domination and STS. Which would be even funnier probably lol

[Ocean]

lol it would be like an episode of spiderman.

[NegaNova]

I'd buy the movie lol

---

In fact... David Wilcock probably is actually legit a super hero. He freaking guessed intuitively where his plane was departing that one time and he was right!

[Ocean]

that's pretty cool

[3DMonkey]

Can someone let me in on the purse thing? I'm lost...

As for the hacking (I don't know how that works either), it's propably an angry fan. Or, since china is being mentioned... He has been trying to promote his website over there recently... A bit of "not on our turf" maybe?

[unity100]

I do wonder to myself why someone would be attacking David Wilcock's website. Why sort of intentions would someone have removing this content from viewers?

Related topic for discussion: does the fact that David Wilcock is now obviously a target for someone in any way imply validation for his information?

a lot of circles in conspiracy/new age interest group dislike him for his ego.

[Namaste]

a lot of circles in conspiracy/new age interest group dislike him for his ego.

His ego comments can be quite endearing (or annoying, depending on your perspective of course!).

On one particular video, he mentions his previous incarnation of Edgar Cayce, saying he doesn't like talking about it, then moves on to explain the similarities between characteristics, his group of friends and the celestial ordering at birth :¬)

To his credit, he always admits that he has an ego, and his own set of challenges.

[unity100]

a lot of circles in conspiracy/new age interest group dislike him for his ego.

His ego comments can be quite endearing (or annoying, depending on your perspective of course!).

On one particular video, he mentions his previous incarnation of Edgar Cayce, saying he doesn't like talking about it, then moves on to explain the similarities between characteristics, his group of friends and the celestial ordering at birth :¬)

To his credit, he always admits that he has an ego, and his own set of challenges.

it may or may not be endearing, however orange ray issues/blockages are serious issues if someone is engaged in channeling work.

he not only apparently has these issue, but also is aware of them and admits them himself. however this admittance doesnt change the fact that he has orange ray issues. orange ray issues makes channeling from a source questionable.

http://lawofone.info/results.php?session...=1&ss=1#23

62.23 Questioner: Isn’t this unusual that a fifth-density entity then would bother to do this rather than sending a fourth-density servant, shall I say?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. Nearly all positive channels and groups may be lessened in their positivity or rendered quite useless by what we may call the temptations offered by the fourth-density negative thought-forms. They may suggest many distortions towards specific information, towards the aggrandizement of the self, towards the flowering of the organization in some political, social, or fiscal way.

These distortions remove the focus from the One Infinite Source of love and light of which we are all messengers, humble and knowing that we, of ourselves, are but the tiniest portion of the Creator, a small part of a magnificent entirety of infinite intelligence.

[Namaste]

Yes indeed. I remember hearing him channel Ra (Sons of Law of One podcast), and heard a few phrases that David uses himself a lot.

Conscious channeling = flavoured output :¬)

[unity100]

Yes indeed. I remember hearing him channel Ra (Sons of Law of One podcast), and heard a few phrases that David uses himself a lot.

Conscious channeling = flavoured output :¬)

when i heard one of those, it totally felt like he was talking himself.

[Namaste]

It put me off a bit also. Ra, Abraham and Bashar are the only channels I trust implicitly :¬)

[Ocean]

he said those channelers who let their ego get away can have serious negative greeting, i hope he stays safe. we all struggle with ego issues but of course channelers have a bigger responsibility, though i think he wants to focus on science. he said he likes the science since it's provable. i love him with or without his ego but i always try to take information with a grain of salt. i should remember that even David is fallible and never trust any information without question.

Can someone let me in on the purse thing? I'm lost...

As for the hacking (I don't know how that works either), it's propably an angry fan. Or, since china is being mentioned... He has been trying to promote his website over there recently... A bit of "not on our turf" maybe?

David mentioned it might have been purse and watch salesmen. apparently they hack sites to sell their purses and watches. i just thought it was odd they'd hack

[Derek]

a lot of circles in conspiracy/new age interest group dislike him for his ego.

His ego comments can be quite endearing (or annoying, depending on your perspective of course!).

On one particular video, he mentions his previous incarnation of Edgar Cayce, saying he doesn't like talking about it, then moves on to explain the similarities between characteristics, his group of friends and the celestial ordering at birth :¬)

To his credit, he always admits that he has an ego, and his own set of challenges.

Here is a repost from another thread. I hope to put those assumptions at rest.


"I have listened to almost every radio show he's ever done and watched every video he's ever done and can count on one hand all the times he has mentioned that he is the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce . He does not like to dwell on it.


He has no ego problems and regularly talks about this on his blog from time to time citing or talking about various angry emails from people accusing him of such things (which is laughable to those of us who follow his work). [example:

WHAT, EXACTLY, IS 'EGO' -- AND WHY IS EVERYONE SO HUNG UP ABOUT IT?

The most common attack-word thrown at me is 'ego'.

The basic idea is that feeling positively about yourself, writing articles in first-person tense with stories from your own life's journey, pursuing greater exposure and offering products so you can afford to keep doing your best to reach people, is a bad thing.

If everything I did were free, then we wouldn't be able to function and our service would end.

If I didn't bother to try to spread the word, then many people who might benefit from my work will never hear about it.

And if being 'humble' means that I answer every email I receive, there will be no new material for people to email me about.

It's very easy to pass judgment. It's much more difficult, but far more rewarding, to forgive and accept those who push your buttons the most, realizing that they wouldn't upset you if they didn't remind you of some unhealed aspect within yourself.

http://divinecosmos.com/index.php?option...&Itemid=70 Note: I also reccomend you study this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection ]

He does do channeling but keeps most of it for personal guidance. If he wasn't following his teachings from his channeling he would have experienced massive negative greeting by now [He openly admits that conscious channeling is much more biased and he is probably around 80% accurate]
"

[quote='unity100' pid='32072' dateline='1300190399']a lot of circles in conspiracy/new age interest group dislike him for his ego.

His ego comments can be quite endearing (or annoying, depending on your perspective of course!).

On one particular video, he mentions his previous incarnation of Edgar Cayce, saying he doesn't like talking about it, then moves on to explain the similarities between characteristics, his group of friends and the celestial ordering at birth :¬)

To his credit, he always admits that he has an ego, and his own set of challenges.

He has never admitted he has an ego problem.

---

Yes indeed. I remember hearing him channel Ra (Sons of Law of One podcast), and heard a few phrases that David uses himself a lot.

Conscious channeling = flavoured output :¬)

Ya, thats how concious channeling works.

We can, my brother, but it may not be totally sensible. Because of the fact that each individual’s mind works so differently, that when we work in an individual’s mind, it is like learning an entirely new computer system, shall we say. The electrical impulses are not in any two cases formed in the same way. There are minds whose intuition is linked very closely with conscious thought. There are other minds who have almost no memory, but whose day-by-day sensations and thoughts are as clear as a brook and we can use those things. Other minds are wired in such a way that there is a very large amount to retrieve from memory of those things thought and read. This instrument is of that type, which among your peoples would be called intellectual. The only unfortunate thing about this instrument is that her fields of knowledge are not particularly those of the Renaissance person and so many questions go completely from one ear to the other without stopping in any way shape or form. Therefore, we have difficulty.

In each case, we use what there is to use. We begin with a vocabulary that must be the instrument’s, for we give to the instrument only concepts. The instrument must find the words to speak what is given. We also attempt to scan the instrument’s knowledge, books, experiences and thoughts to find the closest to which we would call “enlightenment,” so that we may use certain touchstones within that person’s experience upon which to hang a more complex framework, a more varied tapestry of thoughts.

We do this in order that we may touch as many different minds as possible in whatever size group to which we speak, so that in each mind we have struck a chord which may cause a small transformation in thinking; which may in turn cause a feeling of joy, peace or happiness; which may in turn cause each person to seek. Our desire is to challenge your desire.

Thus, we start with the instrument and we proceed therefrom, touching with the instrument’s mind again, and then again, as we scan—we will correct this instrument—as we scan the minds of those within the circle to find what they may wish to listen to.

May we answer you further, my brother?

http://www.llresearch.org/transcripts/is..._0803.aspx

[3DMonkey]

Hackers. This is about hackers.

David rubbs on a lot of people. He admits to receiving hate mail. Those people think he has an ego, and that's what is mentioned here.

David has put out a lot of free stuff that is very very interesting and thought provoking. I have no idea about what he produces for profit. I've never sent him a dime. His free videos are directly linked to me writing in this forum. Even so, I know he is in no way perfect.

[Derek]

Hackers. This is about hackers.

David rubbs on a lot of people. He admits to receiving hate mail. Those people think he has an ego, and that's what is mentioned here.

David has put out a lot of free stuff that is very very interesting and thought provoking. I have no idea about what he produces for profit. I've never sent him a dime. His free videos are directly linked to me writing in this forum. Even so, I know he is in no way perfect.

Ya, I'm certainly not implying that hes perfect. He does admit that he is not perfect, maybe that was what people were confusing him saying that he has "ego problems". When I see people casually attacking someone based on assumptions and projections, I want to step in and clarify.

If someone is seeing ego in David I recommend you study this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

---

Here is the rest of that post

Moderator note: post has been edited to remove extra text.

http://divinecosmos.com/index.php?option...&Itemid=70

Good stuff! Thank you guys for sharing your opinions. It's interesting that Jesus taught love and forgiveness of others, and yet most of the hate-mail I receive uses a select interpretation of Jesus' teachings as a foundation to unleash a torrent of hate.

I never reply to these letters but they are always good for a few laughs. I can't dislike these people because I know I am not the person they think they're writing to.

----------

I've been writing about this stuff for a decade and have never once been harassed, other than having an obvious phone-tap for 2-3 years after I called the FBI to report a psychic vision of a potential nuclear attack against New York City in 1998.

I found out later on that my prophecy accurately described a well-known and very real threat, and that's why they bothered me -- they wanted to know how I knew. Eventually they gave up.

[3DMonkey]

I'm sure he rubbs people the right way too. Those lucky few.