10-18-2010, 11:55 PM
Ra Wrote:14.1 Questioner: After going over this morning’s work, I thought it might be helpful to fill in a few things. You said that the second density strives towards the third density which is the density of self-consciousness, or self-awareness. The striving takes place through higher second-density forms being invested by third-density beings. Could you explain what you mean by this?
Ra: I am Ra. Much as you would put on a vestment, so do your third-density beings invest or clothe some second-density beings with self-awareness. This is often done through the opportunity of what you call pets. It has also been done by various other means of investiture. These include many so-called religious practice complexes which personify and send love to various natural second-density beings in their group form.
The LOO teaches us that 2D animals as our pets are imbued with their 3D masters higher energies through their investiture into them, which as a result increase their own progression towards 3D. Here then is my question. If a house pet, such as the dog, is under the iron rule of an individual such as a Genghis Khan-like personality who is soon ready to graduate into STS 4D, might such a dog under such an influence potentially be more attracted towards the STS path when it too enters into 3D for its time to make its choice to polarize between STS vs STO?
It seems unlikely that such a dog raised in such an unloving and potentially cruel and hostile environment, by such an unloving entity, particularly if we exaggerate the hypothesis by suggesting it was also terribly abused and mistreated, if not potentially tormented, might not have profound residuals leftover as attributes, imbued energies, and general rotten negativity, if even only nominally so, thus perhaps nudging it more towards the choice of STS than towards STO, as compared to his alter ego the STO dog raised in a total, complete, loving, and supportive nurturing environment as the pet of a Gandhi-esque-like personality ready to graduate into STO 4D, which might as likely be nudged to STO as its chosen polarity, when either is afforded its opportunity to incarnate into 3D.
Might this raise an interesting if not important philosophical quandary, or at least create a speculative assumption as regards the LOO in general?
We are taught that The One Infinite Creator wished to experience IT-self. We are taught that IT individuated IT-self in order to do so. Granted, STS was only devised later into the game, but nonetheless it was devised in any event. see below:
Ra Wrote:82.29 Questioner: You have stated in a much earlier session that it is necessary to polarize more than 50% service-to-others to be harvestable fourth-density positive. Was this condition the same at the time before the veil?
Ra: I am Ra. This shall be the last full query of this working.
The query is not answered easily, for the concept of service to self did not hold sway previous to what we have been calling the veiling process. The necessity for graduation to fourth density is an ability to use, welcome, and enjoy a certain intensity of the white light of the One Infinite Creator. In your own terms at your space/time nexus this ability may be measured by your previously stated percentages of service.
The One Infinite Creator as a result of IT now individuating IT-self is nonetheless individuating IT-self at this stage at the more outer bands of the galaxy at a percentage basis of STO vs STS. IT re-created the game in a sense by revising it. Let us assume for the thought experiment to keep the STO/STS individuation at a hypothetical 50/50 basis, or any portion thereof chosen for conversation sakes in order the make the question work as viable.
* So that we do not become derailed into peripheral and irrelevant nuances, it is irrelevant to the metaphor or thought experiment that some STS dudes love their dogs, much less if the 50/50 is 70/30 or any derivations thereof. Lets leave the dog between our ears alone and let him fend for himself in these miserable conditions, as much as not getting stuck on nonsense and details, i.e., how much the dog weighs or if it has spots. Lets just run with the question for a moment. Assuming the above as the thought experiment proposed, might STS/STO be preordained, even if only nominally on some level, as opposed to free will in its entirety? In other words, to spin the question the other way in the effort of clarifying it, if the entire creation elected vis-a-vis free will to be STO, then it seems probable that there would have never been a choice to know IT-self more through the STS creation as an experiment as a counter balance to force polarity, as nothing would have been created in the way of the dichotomy upon us now.
Ra Wrote:30.1 Questioner: I am going to make a statement and then let you correct it if I have made any errors. This is the statement: Creation is a single entity or unity. If only a single entity exists, then the only concept of service is the concept of service to self. If this single entity subdivides, then the concept of service of one of its parts to one of its other parts is born. From this springs the equality of service to self or to others. It would seem that as the Logos subdivided, parts would select each orientation. As individualized entities emerge in space/time then I would assume that they have polarity. Is this statement correct?Might the Game therefore have been rigged? It seems so by the above statement that parts selected each have orientation. Now, does this simply apply to the heavens and above as regards the higher realms, or also to the earth below and the lower realms, i.e. us...even if only nominally from the outset as regards our choice? Remember, it just feels like we're the ones having the experience to endure the suffering. IT is actually having it through us. IT in fact wills that we as IT experience these opposites in dichotomy (through us) to know IT-self more. Remember always, ITs the one having the experience individuated through us. Could the choice therefore have been somewhat forced or preordained for IT-self as a means of creating the duality IT intended so that IT might know IT-self more?
Ra: I am Ra. This statement is quite perceptive and correct until the final phrase in which we note that the polarities begin to be explored only at the point when a third density entity becomes aware of the possibility of choice between the concept or distortion of service to self or service to others. This marks the end of what you may call the unself-conscious or innocent phase of conscious awareness
It seems reasonable to conclude if IT didn't ordain a percentage of STS to STO that the game would otherwise be a failure. It furthermore seems unlikely that the experiment would have been allowed to progress would it not have resulted in the duality IT intended to create. IT needed the differences, the dichotomy, the polarity of extremes. Does the dog then truly have a complete and total free will choice in the matter under the tutelage of a Genghis Khan when it becomes a M/B/S free to choose its polarity , or is this part of the Game rigged to create the existence of STO/STS? Is one dog randomly thrown into the loving environment whilst the other without choice is as randomly thrown to the wretched environment? This supposition would seem too random, if not too unfair? May our paths in choice, as a result, possibly begin nominally before we even enter 3D, but that in 3D we need to polarize in self awareness to the path more leaned into? Or was the dog in said wretched conditions literally just an unlucky son of a b*tch for no reason whatsoever? Seems unlikely. I dunno........
If your reading this mattschryer, I wonder if this fits in at all into your question and post on "Predeterminism, The Law of One, and The Distortion of Free Will?"
...L/L...
~ Q ~