(10-18-2012, 02:56 AM)rie Wrote: Well, seems like fear and anxiety could lead to hope, but where does anger go? Particularly if anger is one's primary emotion.Anger is an attachment to something rejected. Usually we attempt to put distance between the object of anger and our consciousness. So the associated emotion has no route to consciousness. If you reject it consciously, you may polarize negatively.
I use other terminologies and explanation of emotions as I am of a different theoretical orientation than you are, but I understand & accept your point.
(10-18-2012, 03:24 AM)rie Wrote: Hogey: re: wizard of oz analogy... do we get to keep our ruby slippers? lol
Why did Ruppert and Wilcock change their position from one extreme to the other? Is their hopeful view more of a reflection of how being on one end of the fear/hope spectrum shifts to the other extreme? It's a bit iffy to me when someone does that, although I see it done many times by many people.
If DW had an independent thought, it'd die of lonlieness. He's bound himself to that sub-collective meme which is overly fixated on outward illusion and what it can be molded into to fulfill fantasy and whim.