Gerson: Cancer and Disease - What corporations do not want you to know

[BrownEye]

If we were to construct a permeable barrier, or veil, and pass this magnet through such that exactly one-half of it was poking through to the other side, there would be no way to tell from the other side, if it were the south or the north pole of the magnet. They are identical, and the naming of each side is completely arbitrary.

An obvious analog would be a compass. So what do you suppose the analog is for? And why do you suppose that it is impossible for anyone to be using the spiritual compass?

The "light of harvestable quality" is what can be perceived, and this is a function of the degree of polarization. It says nothing, however, about which path the polarization occurred. The light is the same light, whether it was attracted through negative or positive polarization. There isn't a "positive" and "negative" light. Just light.

85.11 you may see that the service-to-self choice is one which denies the very center of the spectrum

Sorry bud, many, many of us can see.:idea:

Free will of course allows you to choose not to see. With 4D, 5D, and 6D tools and guidance available, why ignore it all?

To polarize on the negative path, an entity must "go against the grain", or seek to control the catalyst offered.

What you call zealots go against the grain, yet many are polarized positive, and almost none are polarized negative. Pretty much the only polarized negative entities run the world, giving us our core religious beliefs and schooling institutions.

A common mistake is to think that "going with the flow" is the same as "getting in the flow". A positive polarized entity that gets in the flow is given the power to help others (showing us more options/choices), while a negative polarized entity is given the power to control others (removing options/choices). Just "going with the flow" is following the path of least resistance and is not polarizing at all. Following the routine habits and addictions can be "going with the flow".

To polarize on the negative path, an entity must "go against the grain", or seek to control the catalyst offered.

You have a way to find the line between consciously created catalyst and control of catalyst? If you did you would also "see" what you are trying to say is impossible to see.

I only know of one other person on this forum that can measure someones polarity. So i find it humorous when folks fling the terms "polarity" and "sts/sto". I really have to bite my tongue

As far as anybody around the forum who claims they can make such an assessment, I am reminded of another quote:

One might consider the polarities with the literal nature enjoyed by the physical polarity of the magnet. The negative and positive, with their electrical characteristics, may be seen to be just as in the physical sense. It is to be noted in this context that it is quite impossible to judge the polarity of an act or an entity, just as it is impossible to judge the relative goodness of the negative and positive poles of the magnet.

Another method of viewing polarities might involve the concept of radiation/absorption. That which is positive is radiant; that which is negative is absorbent.

Within the analogy, as all is one, it is impossible to judge anything. And so there is no choice to be made. Yet, some of us are here to place importance on choice, and we will continue the game.

13.23 However, the thought-forms of your people during this transition period are such that the mind/body/spirit complexes of both individual and societies are scattered throughout the spectrum instead of becoming able to grasp the needle, shall we say, and point the compass in one direction.

Isn't it interesting that compass is part of the word compassion?