Taras Bulba, Genghis Khan, Rasputin

[Cyan]

I apologize if this inquiry has been addressed before, but I am little confused as to why Ra has mentions a historically fictional figure (Taras Bulba) as a negative entity. I know that Taras is a character based of the works of Nikolai Gogol and I remember his name heavily referenced on the Russian media as a child.
Maybe Ra meant that the nature of the book itself calibrated on a negative level, or maybe the the character was actually based of a real historical figure whom Gogol adopted into his work?

anyway just a thought I wanted to share.

Taras Bulba was fictional in the same sense that Jesus Christ (Jehoshuah/Yesua) was fictional. There were real historical personalities associated with these names. They weren't exactly like their fictionalized counterparts.

This is what Ra was referring to, in my opinion.

And these people are a made of what (archtypes) which are... which are... which are.... "it" returns to "even thoughts are photons spinning, and one photon spinning in one bubble is its own universe.

I think.

Dunno. But I think that Ra is saying that anything besides yourself is always fictional but due to its nature can be made real or unreal depending on your wish directed at it.