(11-11-2012, 07:17 PM)Pickle Wrote: To look at this honestly, how do we compare the percentage that died from the treatments to the percentage that died from natural "treatments"?
I personally knew 13 people that died from cancer treatment compared to zero for natural methods. I have a relative that gained another 30 years (still counting) after being given 6 months (not to his knowledge).
Brilliant idea, Pickle! I too have met many people who healed using natural methods, and many who died using allopathic methods. But the reverse isn't true. In most cases, those who healed using natural methods were already given up on by the allopathic doctors.
(11-11-2012, 07:20 PM)zenmaster Wrote: It's zealotry - bias. When contents of the unconscious surface only according to specific considerations
They are irrelevant to the question - which serves to further reinforce my comments. I already know chemo can cause cancer - I don't need a link to tell me that.
No. Knowingly telling untruths or hiding truth is lying. Very simple.