11-21-2012, 05:57 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-21-2012, 06:12 PM by Tenet Nosce.)
(11-21-2012, 05:52 PM)hogey11 Wrote: Why do we believe all these numbers and attributes as if they were hard science? 0.5% this and 2.6% that. It's all made up numbers.
That's why I said it was an assumption.
Quote:Am I missing something? Is there some source of these 'hard numbers' that I am not knowing about?
This particular distribution does occur in nature fairly often. When or where in the curve we are is a secondary discussion, and there is probably no way to know for sure. But I think taking a reasonable guess shouldn't be automatically discredited.
Anyway, the point is in showing that the time differential between 0.2% and 2.0% of the population accessing 4D vibrations could be relatively swift, as compared to the length of the density as a whole.
It could change in, say, less than a decade. That's a whole order of magnitude of a difference. But more than that, it is enough of a difference, given the Law of Squares, to counterbalance the will of the masses.