11-21-2012, 11:07 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-21-2012, 11:10 PM by Tenet Nosce.)
(11-21-2012, 10:00 PM)Goldenratio Wrote: Tenet, im curious about what you feel causes the slowdown in growth/"advancement" in the middle sub densities as compared to your proposed relative speed at which apparently people move into and out of a density after going through this slow period.
I think different things can affect the variable length in years of the sub-densities. Free will can make a big difference one way or another.
In third-density we have mixed polarities, so those moving in both directions create a "drag" on each other, and contribute to the inertia of the masses to remain unpolarized.
Also, if we are to take the beginning of 4th sub-density to be ca. 1935, then we have moved through this subdensity relatively quickly as compared to the others. One difference would be having acquired nuclear capabilities and the attention that attracted to ourselves.
Quote:And would this same pattern hold true if one were to look at growth through an octave do you think?
Which pattern?
(11-21-2012, 10:33 PM)rie Wrote:(11-21-2012, 07:59 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: Yes- although in this particular graph the mean is on the border between 4th and 5th subdensity. It's debatable if that's actually the case, but I think a fair approximation.
Hopefully it's skewed to the right... or at least slightly more to the right.
Why do you say that?