11-24-2012, 04:52 PM
(11-23-2012, 10:24 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote:Yes.(11-23-2012, 10:09 PM)zenmaster Wrote: I wouldn't think any 1D change in the sun would have anything to do with a 4D transition?
Observing such a change would provide catalyst to impact consciousness.
(11-23-2012, 10:24 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: Such a change would prove that Larson's theory is correct.No.
(11-23-2012, 10:24 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: That would be the modern day equivalent of discovering that the earth is round, or not at the center of the universe. It would mean pretty much everything we think we know is wrong.Well, it would be unexpected due to lack of observable evidence and theoretical basis.
(11-23-2012, 10:24 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote:Short-term instability would seem to be detrimental to evolution of life in the solar system.Quote: I'd imagine that the sun would remain rather stable for a few billion years more to provide such an opportunity.
If the transition is relatively harmless, what opportunity would be lost by making it now?
(11-23-2012, 10:24 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: At any rate this just impels me more to read Larson's work. I am just starting Beyond Space and Time.You should start with something which describes the Reciprocal System, like "Nothing But Motion". Also the "Outline of the Deductive Development of the Theory of the Universe of Motion"
Beyond Space and Time is Larson's last book, which attempts to apply his theory to other realms (higher densities).