Shin'Ar, the meat threads have been mostly about general principles. What you are describing is specific situations.
There's a world of difference. Among Law of One students, it's a given that every choice affects other-selves, and that we cannot dictate rules about what to do in specific situations. That's where personal guidance comes in. That's why the 'ethical dilemma scenarios' you describe haven't been part of the conversation.
Also, our community doesn't really appeal to extreme fundamentalists.
In any given situation, our choices (in my opinion) should be based on 2 things:
1. The principles we have chosen to live by (according to our chosen path; ie., STS or STO)
and
2. Our personal guidance in that particular moment
They won't conflict. If they do, then we should probably question whether we are hearing our guidance correctly, as personal guidance should never go against our principles. (In other words, if one believe their guidance is telling them to murder someone, then they might want to question where that guidance is coming from.)
If we act according to our personal guidance and according to the general principles of our chosen path, and in so doing we inadvertently cause some catalyst for someone else, then that isn't our concern. Our sincere, honest action will have been integrated into the fabric of the Universe.
If, however, we act in opposition to our guidance and the ethical principles of our path, and that choice leads to catalyst for someone else, then we've just incurred karma.
The discussions have been about general principles. It is up to us to apply those principles in any given situation, tempered with our own personal guidance.
The general principles applicable to 4D harvestability have to do with love/compassion/forgiveness/peace. That is all that's required in most instances. Wanderers concurrently learning 5D lessons may also have the task of applying wisdom. But that won't replace the 4D principles; it will only enhance them.
Thus, over-analyzing Situation A or Situation B serves no purpose in the context of the principles of compassion in regards to our younger 2D brethren, other than as an academic exercise.
There's a world of difference. Among Law of One students, it's a given that every choice affects other-selves, and that we cannot dictate rules about what to do in specific situations. That's where personal guidance comes in. That's why the 'ethical dilemma scenarios' you describe haven't been part of the conversation.
Also, our community doesn't really appeal to extreme fundamentalists.
In any given situation, our choices (in my opinion) should be based on 2 things:
1. The principles we have chosen to live by (according to our chosen path; ie., STS or STO)
and
2. Our personal guidance in that particular moment
They won't conflict. If they do, then we should probably question whether we are hearing our guidance correctly, as personal guidance should never go against our principles. (In other words, if one believe their guidance is telling them to murder someone, then they might want to question where that guidance is coming from.)
If we act according to our personal guidance and according to the general principles of our chosen path, and in so doing we inadvertently cause some catalyst for someone else, then that isn't our concern. Our sincere, honest action will have been integrated into the fabric of the Universe.
If, however, we act in opposition to our guidance and the ethical principles of our path, and that choice leads to catalyst for someone else, then we've just incurred karma.
The discussions have been about general principles. It is up to us to apply those principles in any given situation, tempered with our own personal guidance.
The general principles applicable to 4D harvestability have to do with love/compassion/forgiveness/peace. That is all that's required in most instances. Wanderers concurrently learning 5D lessons may also have the task of applying wisdom. But that won't replace the 4D principles; it will only enhance them.
Thus, over-analyzing Situation A or Situation B serves no purpose in the context of the principles of compassion in regards to our younger 2D brethren, other than as an academic exercise.