Is the Law of One harmonious with the Abrahamic faiths?

[βαθμιαίος]

Interesting post at another forum. I don't really agree (especially about the Law of One being from demons), but it's interesting to think about how well the Ra material jibes or doesn't jibe with Christianity, Judaism, and Islam.

http://vigilantcitizen.com/vcboards/view...14#p413814

I believe there is quite an amount of irreoncilable differences between Ra's Law of One and the fundamental principles of Abrahamic faiths (Though I will be speaking mainly through a Christian perspective, if that even makes a difference with this topic).

One could take certain statements from the Bible and see them as parallels towards the principles of the LOO but I see this as quite a stretch as, in the context of the scriptures as a whole, the meanings of these statements do not equal what certain individuals may be interpreting them as. One can cherry pick isolated passages to fit a plethora of meanings, but many times with this being done there arises contradictions to the interpretation among the other bodies of scripture (Not speaking solely of other books in the Bible either).

From what I know of the LOO, it clearly states that all things are one, and all compromise the Creator. This clearly is a pantheistic mentality and it is thoroughly rejected within the Bible which claims God as a sovereign ruler and creator. Continually we are called to be His servants, not essences of Him bearing equality. Nature and the world are created without any signification they are as well apart of Him. God expressly opposed cultures and religions which adhered to such pantheistic mentality as well. These matters are simply not compatible.

From what I also remember, there exists no exact right or wrong within the LOO, as they exist within Abrahamic faiths. Everything is ultimately connected to the Creator. It's all based on ''identity'' within the Creator. Feelings and mentalities of fear, negativity, and etc. are opposed within this doctrine but in a way that states, ''that is not good for your well being,'' not, ''This is evil in the sight of the Lord and worthy of punishment.'' There is a huge difference here.

Ultimately the LOO is just another doctrine from demons which state that we are gods and don't need to be concerned about having a relationship with Jesus Christ as is stated within scriptures. Christ is turned into more of an ideal to metaphysically replicate. The relationship is fundamentally built on a relationship to ourselves, and through ourselves we automatically gain a relationship with ''God,'' for we are all one and the same.

This doctrine takes away the sovereignty of God and seeks to place us at His own level. It turns sins (The rejection of God and His kingdom, worthy of not ever being apart of it (Thus eternally destroyed)) only into errors that inhibit one from ever becoming better in themselves. It takes away all power and correction that can be taken from God and places it into the hands of man. We are to atone for our own mistakes. We are to make ourselves ''holy.'' It's all about us.

This mentality defies the very nature of God, ourselves, the relationship we should seek with Him, the objective laws of all reality, and the consequences of rejecting said laws.

By no means are they in alignment.