Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Spiritual Development & Metaphysical Matters Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst

    Thread: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst


    Confused (Offline)

    I am not the doer. The Tao is.
    Posts: 17,490
    Threads: 12
    Joined: Dec 2008
    #12
    12-02-2012, 05:38 AM (This post was last modified: 12-02-2012, 06:17 AM by Confused.)
    (11-30-2012, 02:43 PM)Ankh Wrote: What do you guys think?

    Quote:92.18 Questioner: Turning, then, to my analogy or example of the newborn infant and its undistorted Matrix of the Mind, this newborn infant has its subconscious mind veiled from the Matrix of the Mind. The second archetype, the Potentiator of the Mind, is going to act at some time through the veil—though I hesitate to say through the veil since I don’t think that is a very good way of stating it—but the Potentiator of the Mind will act to create a condition such as the example I mentioned of the infant touching a hot object. The hot object we could take as random catalyst. The infant can either leave its hand on the hot object or rapidly remove it. My question is, is the Potentiator of the Mind involved at all in this experience and, if so, how?

    Ra: I am Ra. The Potentiator of Mind and of Body are both involved in the questing of the infant for new experience. The mind/body/spirit complex which is an infant has one highly developed portion which may be best studied by viewing the Significators of Mind and Body. You notice we do not include the spirit. That portion of a mind/body/spirit complex is not reliably developed in each and every mind/body/spirit complex. Thusly the infant’s significant self, which is the harvest of biases of all previous incarnational experiences, offers to this infant biases with which to meet new experience.

    However, the portion of the infant which may be articulated by the Matrix of the Mind is indeed unfed by experience and has the bias of reaching for this experience through free will just as intelligent energy in the kinetic phase, through free will, creates the Logos. This sub-sub-Logos, then, or that portion of the mind/body/spirit complex which may be articulated by consideration of the Potentiators of Mind and Body, through free will, choose to make alterations in their experiential continuum. The results of these experiments in novelty are then recorded in the portion of the mind and body articulated by the Matrices thereof.

    As far as my mind is able to understand, it is becoming clear to me that creation is an experiment in novelty. We still have the power to break away from the traditional constricted modes and bring in novel solutions to the experiences of the spirit, which I think feeds into the conduit of learning/experiencing for the One Infinite Creator.

    If those of us who truly love this planet and humanity get together, focus our intents and harmonize our energies for the greatest good of the planet, we can create the most novel solutions for the betterment of the planet, which may surprise even our Great Mother Logos, the spirit of the Milky-way galaxy.
    [+] The following 3 members thanked thanked Confused for this post:3 members thanked Confused for this post
      • Aaron, norral, Ankh
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Ankh - 11-30-2012, 02:43 PM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Plenum - 11-30-2012, 02:50 PM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Ankh - 11-30-2012, 02:58 PM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Aaron - 11-30-2012, 03:08 PM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Aaron - 11-30-2012, 02:52 PM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by BrownEye - 11-30-2012, 03:08 PM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by reeay - 11-30-2012, 05:27 PM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Tenet Nosce - 11-30-2012, 05:46 PM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by norral - 11-30-2012, 05:55 PM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Meerie - 12-01-2012, 07:00 AM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Ankh - 12-02-2012, 04:24 AM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Tenet Nosce - 12-02-2012, 02:10 PM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Aaron - 12-02-2012, 04:45 PM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Tenet Nosce - 12-02-2012, 04:51 PM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by AnthroHeart - 12-03-2012, 11:20 AM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Aaron - 12-04-2012, 04:59 AM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Confused - 12-02-2012, 05:38 AM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Confused - 12-03-2012, 01:28 AM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Ankh - 12-04-2012, 06:02 AM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Confused - 12-04-2012, 06:52 AM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Tenet Nosce - 12-04-2012, 03:20 PM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Aaron - 12-06-2012, 08:14 AM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Bring4th_Austin - 12-05-2012, 04:54 AM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Ankh - 12-05-2012, 11:27 AM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Tenet Nosce - 12-05-2012, 01:51 PM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Ankh - 12-05-2012, 05:14 PM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Tenet Nosce - 12-05-2012, 11:22 PM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Ankh - 12-06-2012, 06:19 AM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Tenet Nosce - 12-06-2012, 01:14 PM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Ankh - 12-07-2012, 06:56 AM
    RE: Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst - by Sagittarius - 12-06-2012, 08:44 AM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode