Positive/negative interpretations of a catalyst

[Ankh]

This desire could also be just unpolarized...?

Can you offer some examples of unpolarized yellow/orange ray activity?

Unpolarized *action*... Um, good question! Could writing a post on Bring4th forum be an unpolarized action if one is writing that post due to a catalytic response to what one is reading, and reacting to it by writing this response but with no conscious understanding of its own catalytic reaction and with no conscious *desire* to serve the one to whom one is responding? Would that be an unpolarized action? Dunno... Just contemplating your question...

Defining "compassion" as the feeling/expression of negative emotions is just plain wrong. Not in the ethical sense of wrong... but in the sense of what is true and what is false. To "be compassionate" is to actually feel compassion (which is a positive emotion) when faced with the injustices and atrocities of this world.

To accuse others of "lacking compassion" because they don't feel negative emotions when presented with dark images is not only foolish- but actually evidence of a green-ray blockage on the part of the accuser.

Those whose green-ray were fully activated would not make accusations. Period.

I agree.

I understand, in this case, you are viewing "the condition of Gaia" as the catalyst, and offering the idea that there are different conditions we can view and appreciate. To me, viewing the first images and viewing the latter images are separate catalyst. They are different things, and evoke a separate emotional response.

Perhaps this is not the point of your post, but if you view a picture of a hurt Gaia, wouldn't there be possibility for negative or positive catalyst without having to seek out other catalyst, i.e. pictures of beauty among Gaia?

Imagine being presented with just the first set of pictures you presented and not having the photos of beauty to balance them. Positive interpretation of catalyst, in my eyes, would have to do with interpreting that catalyst in a positive way. It is easy for us to accept the beauty of Gaia in her natural state, isn't it? In my opinion, the challenge would be finding love in the moment you see the destruction caused, not the moment later when you view a beautiful scene rather than an ugly one.

So what would positive interpretation of the images of destruction be? I'm unsure. I feel like an acceptance for Gaia's situation (not to be confused with complacency), the circumstances and the entities that led her to this point. A longing to relieve the suffering of Gaia we perceive among these images seems to me to be a positive interpretation.

Either way, if we view the images of destruction and it invokes an emotional response, I would say it is catalyst in itself which has both possible positive and negative interpretation, which doesn't need to be balanced by the acceptance we find in beauty but may be balanced in acceptance on its own term.

You have a point perhaps, but as you mentioned, the specific catalyst is not the point of my post. In this particular case though, I tried to present the entire condition of Gaia as the catalyst which one can interpret in two different ways. But you are right, one could focus one's attention on Gaia's condition in the first set of pictures or in the second one. And in that scenario, you are right, going into each set, one can extrapolate a further set of negative/positive catalysts and in turn, positive/negative interpretations of these catalysts. My point with this post though, is negative/positive interpretations of *a* catalyst perhaps, and how it might or might not aid to lighten this planetary vibration.