Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Community Olio Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016

    Thread: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016


    Cyan

    Guest
     
    #12
    12-15-2012, 03:29 PM
    (12-15-2012, 02:31 PM)zenmaster Wrote:
    (12-15-2012, 12:52 PM)Bring4th_Aaron Wrote:
    (12-15-2012, 12:12 PM)zenmaster Wrote:
    (12-15-2012, 04:22 AM)Pickle Wrote:
    (12-15-2012, 03:15 AM)zenmaster Wrote: The petition has reached the 25,000 required votes which means the White House must respond.

    It will probably spur them on to coming up with new twists on conspiracies, something to get the public to push the boundaries of stupidity. I wonder how many conspiracies are cooked up in the white hose?
    whatever is generated, they will find a nice home on these forums where they are routinely indulged. Even the moderators encourage that social framing.

    Could you define the term "social framing" in this context?
    As in the duality of those who would control circumstances to their desired ends vs those who would suffer due to that control.

    (12-15-2012, 12:52 PM)Bring4th_Aaron Wrote: Do you feel like we encourage discussion of conspiracy theory-like material?
    Google the following:
    site:bring4th.org +mayan +21
    site:bring4th.org +manipulated
    site:bring4th.org +haarp
    site:bring4th.org +911
    site:bring4th.org +nwo
    site:bring4th.org +leaked
    site:bring4th.org +"inside job"
    site:bring4th.org +secret +government
    site:bring4th.org +manmade
    site:bring4th.org +nasa +hiding
    site:bring4th.org +Haramein
    site:bring4th.org +stargate
    site:bring4th.org +whistleblower
    site:bring4th.org +chemtrails
    site:bring4th.org +capitalist
    site:bring4th.org +"mind control"
    site:bring4th.org +fluoridation
    site:bring4th.org +"david wilcock"
    site:bring4th.org +elite
    site:bring4th.org +illuminati
    site:bring4th.org +"powers that be"
    site:bring4th.org +govt +aliens
    site:bring4th.org +Bilderberg
    site:bring4th.org +controllers
    site:bring4th.org +sts +lies
    site:bring4th.org +disclosure
    site:bring4th.org +"cover up"
    site:bring4th.org +spiral +norway
    site:bring4th.org +"mainstream media"

    Ahhhahahahahahahahhhhhehehehehahahahahahaheheheh *continues for a while*

    Anything that is STO is conspiracy theory according to who ever is in charge at that moment, or have I missed something? If we had a good order by default we would not need to rebel (be in the guarantine, fight to save others, what ever you want to call it) (let me make it clear. IF there was a good guy in charge at a single point that is always the same guy at that single point, would there not be an inherantly good order of things and we the outcasts because we are saying our order is not good order, that we must be removed from this disorder and placed in a new order to be happy. Thats a pretty you know... wide... statement.)

    (Edit)I'm not here because I dislike being here. I am here because I like being here. I dont need to be harvested to like being where I am, and with who I. I literally could not care less which side of the polarity I end up in "after harvest" because it will be ultimately just because the universe is, ultimately just. IT may not appear like that at every moment but its justice should never come into sane question, because to question it is to question the existence of laws that govern the order of things (Gravity). And imply that at its core the apple may just as likely fall up from the tree as down. Such a universe would serve no inherent purpose as any lack of predictability makes for an impossibility of observation, as intelligence and observation deduction and reasoning would never have a measurable effect on the totally random surroundings, and thus no intelligent part of the infinity is born.

    I am just tickled pink that people think that they'll be "harvested to a good world" when their starting assumption is that they even need to know such a phenomena exists, or that they need to worry about something that is only possible if the cosmos itself is intelligent. That there truly are still people in so much sorrow they think that it is possible to create an unjust harvest. But I suppose thats what we are here for, right? I don't know, but I have this weird calling to look out for people like that, people that have this fragile belief in their lack of salvation. And shatter it with a sledgehammer. Sometimes I could use a bit more tact, but I am just so tickled pink by all this! Edit over, getting back to the previous programming )(/Edit for a bit more explanation for those who actually care BigSmile)

    STO is by definition that which lies at the edges, the periphery, the outside the norm, that which is yet to be accepted into that which is self sufficient. STO Is the experiment, STS is the reality. Thats why STO is so much more fun (because its changing). and STS is much less fun (It is the established order, the way we know stuff works because the truth is contained in the law itself) (if conditions are X, and you do Y, Z will occur, but conditions X must apply before the rest happens). Thats a fancy way of saying STS is the law of gravity, we know that when you drop a apple in a gravity field of earth it will fall to the ground. So anyone touching that concept has a better chance of actual progress if they just download "law of gravity" from "library" into their "merkaba" as "STS" (willing taking in info) and then focus their search into applications of the self and its abilities in proper communities for the development of the whole. If you feel like you want to be a writer, hang around writers, thats quite enough to know about any wants. They'll fill you in on the details. You will be just where you need to be, etc. Same general principle applies to everything. If you want to be STO, hang around STO right? Nope because think about it. What is STO? Is STO a act (writing). Or to quote Ra. "Ethics as activity (verb)"

    Service to.

    Anyway. Thats all about that for now.

    So, You know, the way i see it, the fact that this forum accepts, espouses and virtually revels in conspiracy theories is not only a good thing, it is a unobtenium mine for writers such as what I mainly visualize myself as doing (imagining in words). It is, in essence, the required condition for my perceptual cone "Ra" to even be here.

    IF only we had a dedicated alternate history section here, i'd be set to call this my spiritual platform type of preference if not content/poster type of preference, that changing from day to day.

    One forum area where people may post fictional stories that they write or co-write as a group that are mostly focused on alternatives (What if something else had happened/something else than what is exists).

    I'd probably write a ALT about this alien antrhopologist guy who visits this planet of STO oriented people who want to be a part of a 6thD STO memory complex by their wording. But lack the inner founding and stability to maintain a sufficient self identity to release onto the galactic scale.

    Anyway would be an interesting alternative timeline and allow some. *cough* experimentation */cough* that most spiritual forums strongly discourage due to its magical *cough* nature. */cough*

    Creative writing section thats not just a sideforum but kind of the creative intent in a way. (not talking treehuggers)

    Anyway. I'm just throwing ideas around for developement and see what happens.

    I hope this makes sense to some readers BigSmile

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by zenmaster - 12-15-2012, 03:15 AM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by Parsons - 12-15-2012, 04:06 AM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by BrownEye - 12-15-2012, 04:22 AM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by zenmaster - 12-15-2012, 12:12 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by Aaron - 12-15-2012, 12:52 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by zenmaster - 12-15-2012, 02:31 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by Cyan - 12-15-2012, 03:29 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by zenmaster - 12-15-2012, 03:57 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by Aaron - 12-16-2012, 04:53 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by zenmaster - 12-16-2012, 06:22 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by Aaron - 12-17-2012, 08:37 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by nych9 - 12-15-2012, 10:31 AM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by Confused - 12-15-2012, 10:50 AM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by Cyan - 12-15-2012, 10:55 AM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by Karl - 12-15-2012, 03:08 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by hogey11 - 12-15-2012, 03:27 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by Cyan - 12-15-2012, 03:31 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by reeay - 12-15-2012, 03:29 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by hogey11 - 12-15-2012, 03:46 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by Cyan - 12-15-2012, 03:49 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by Cyan - 12-15-2012, 04:01 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by hogey11 - 12-15-2012, 04:24 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by Cyan - 12-15-2012, 05:57 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by Brittany - 12-15-2012, 05:04 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by GentleReckoning - 12-15-2012, 05:35 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by hogey11 - 12-16-2012, 05:20 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by hogey11 - 12-16-2012, 09:41 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by zenmaster - 12-16-2012, 09:51 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by hogey11 - 12-16-2012, 10:26 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by zenmaster - 12-16-2012, 11:18 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by Meerie - 01-12-2013, 07:10 AM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by Cyan - 01-12-2013, 08:24 AM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by Taco - 01-12-2013, 04:36 PM
    RE: Petition to custruct a Death Star by 2016 - by zenmaster - 02-11-2013, 10:51 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode