David Wilcock, Daniel, & The Harvest

[Cyan]

I suggest trying one of the non-channelled books. Discernment is not
so strenuous with non-channelled material.

"Secret History of the World" is devoid of STS influence.

Personally, I rate the accuracy of the five Ra books at 67%. Don Elkins is the one who was negatively influenced by STS entities from elsewhere. He committed suicide. I rate the C channelling at 83%. That's my intuition. Not asking you to agree.

By the late '90s, there was 15 years to digest content from the five books. The questions reflect the pondering associated with having read the early content. That's why it's so helpful.

There are some controversial points in the C channelling. For example, it's been explained that 4D STS bodies don't generate orgasm energy. It doesn't mean they don't like orgasm energy. They just can't generate it within their own physiology.

That's what connects us them: Their interest in harvesting our orgasms.

During orgasm the body releases something that can be stored and transported within the 4D STS infrastructure. Tantra, given the emphasis on circulating sexual energy, is probably not conducive to this process. Regular bunny sex would yield more, and masturbation would be most effective.

We use animals for food. We generate something precious. That energy has value on negative 4D.

We regard sex as something to do. It can also be seen as something being done to us.

Learning to hold energy recycle it, and build it up is part of Taoism and other disciplines. It's also difficult, particularly for those with a strong libido. The channelling about 4D STS bodies using us for the purpose of stockpiling orgasm energy explains one reason why this is difficult.

Doesn't this make any sense? Or do you think I'm getting fooled by the negatives?

I agree with what you say in principle. However, it requires a pre 6th D point of view to see pursuit of that principle beyond mere agreeing that it is a principle as a wise thing to do. Far as I know.

Ra material is closer to 50-50 sto-sts line indeed instead of the 95-5 sto-sts line