02-25-2010, 03:59 PM
carrie, that's a really interesting summary of the story of the universe in one page!
From what I've studied so far, it seems that there is 80% overlap with what the Law of One materials teach.
I'm not sure if device is the proper term for the generation of space and time... perhaps "process" or "flow" is a better term? To me "device" implies something mechanical and external. This site http://www.glafreniere.com/matter.htm has an interesting perspective. The math is more detailed than my current math skills can comprehend. You might well be able to follow all the equations. It also includes some code samples.
Even though I can't follow all the details, what I can understand of the explanation of moving and standing wave patterns feels accurate to me. The site includes an explanation of how no additional energy input is needed once the universe was initially created. It also has a granular or pixelated model of the aether.
His approach is entirely based on physics, and he declines to say or speculate anything about metaphysics. "In all good faith and sincerity, one must admit that there is no material explanation for aether. Its origin is postulated to be un-material.... So let's postulate that in the beginning of times the aether suddenly begun to exist." And, "I do not say here that human beings have no soul. I simply note that those two apparently metaphysical reasons which have been invoked in order to explain the soul's existence have been clearly identified as being physic ones. So they belong to physics. If this does not satisfy your personal metaphysical thoughts, I cannot help. I just want to discuss physics. So please avoid annoying me about your emotional feelings and just discuss physics, because it is an exact science. Physics is the science of truth and reality."
I disagree with his implication on page 29 that Malthus was right, but that's a discussion for another time.
You might also like this site which is linked from the one above: http://mwolff.tripod.com/. He is actively looking for a 3D programmer to help visualize some of his equations.
Now, if the universe can be correctly understood as though it consists of discreet units of energy level which change at discreet time intervals, what are the consequences? One is that this premise http://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation.html may be true.
Another possibility would be that it's the One Creator's continuing creativity and curiosity is what causes the continuous creation of new instants and new moments, in which this endless love can endlessly have further objects and moments in which the love might be received and returned.
From what I've studied so far, it seems that there is 80% overlap with what the Law of One materials teach.
I'm not sure if device is the proper term for the generation of space and time... perhaps "process" or "flow" is a better term? To me "device" implies something mechanical and external. This site http://www.glafreniere.com/matter.htm has an interesting perspective. The math is more detailed than my current math skills can comprehend. You might well be able to follow all the equations. It also includes some code samples.
Even though I can't follow all the details, what I can understand of the explanation of moving and standing wave patterns feels accurate to me. The site includes an explanation of how no additional energy input is needed once the universe was initially created. It also has a granular or pixelated model of the aether.
His approach is entirely based on physics, and he declines to say or speculate anything about metaphysics. "In all good faith and sincerity, one must admit that there is no material explanation for aether. Its origin is postulated to be un-material.... So let's postulate that in the beginning of times the aether suddenly begun to exist." And, "I do not say here that human beings have no soul. I simply note that those two apparently metaphysical reasons which have been invoked in order to explain the soul's existence have been clearly identified as being physic ones. So they belong to physics. If this does not satisfy your personal metaphysical thoughts, I cannot help. I just want to discuss physics. So please avoid annoying me about your emotional feelings and just discuss physics, because it is an exact science. Physics is the science of truth and reality."
I disagree with his implication on page 29 that Malthus was right, but that's a discussion for another time.
You might also like this site which is linked from the one above: http://mwolff.tripod.com/. He is actively looking for a 3D programmer to help visualize some of his equations.
Now, if the universe can be correctly understood as though it consists of discreet units of energy level which change at discreet time intervals, what are the consequences? One is that this premise http://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation.html may be true.
Another possibility would be that it's the One Creator's continuing creativity and curiosity is what causes the continuous creation of new instants and new moments, in which this endless love can endlessly have further objects and moments in which the love might be received and returned.