02-07-2009, 12:07 PM
(02-06-2009, 10:56 PM)Quantum Wrote: If I were to pursue this line of reasoning, I would ask, if the illuminati are who we are to believe they are, how in the world would anyone acquire this very illuminati presumably highly secret information, and if acquired, why would one assume that if they gave it out to the general public, or allowed it it be leaked, that it would be reliable? I would offer that this information would by any reasonable standards be suspect.
Let me ask you quantum, instead of making such a post did it occur to you to actually 'read' or investigate the source in question (David Wilcock's) work. Which, is both personally and scientifically impeccable.
And then, I see you have, let me answer one few of those questions you have proposed up there.
D) Quo are more open to challenge than Ra because the Law of One was channeled from an unconscious state which makes it unavailable to conscious interference. The only other channeling with this sort of degree of refinement is the original Edgar Cayce readings.
I once remember reading a Quo session where the spirit said that they aimed to get 70% of themselves and 30% of who they were speaking through. This was becasue they were having difficulty with the channel that wasn't participating enough or was blocking things.
E) Carla perhaps just prefers Quo, as a less scientific spirit. Also there is the question of whether she can channel Ra without going into unconsciousness and risking displacement.
It is worth mentioning that David and Carla used to live together, (If I remember correctly), and that they are fine with their differences.
Also, when David talked of the ascension as a sudden shift event, he may have changed his mind with any new data coming in. The 700 year argument has also been offset by that post by David, but by no means does that mean that anyone has to adopt the sudden view.
To be honest, I prefer the chaos of nobody knowing.
There is no reason why both can't be true from different points of view?