03-10-2013, 09:31 PM
yup Feynman was mentioned by name. btw Amit Didn't say fully understands QM.
EDIT: That statement above was me being defensive. I think I should have said Amit's Model instead of understanding, I think that would be more appropriate because I can't get at his understanding because it's subjective... duh! I want to say I should have kept my opinion to myself and just stopped at the first post but that's just me damning myself. I'm trying be passionate while remaining compassionate. I was seeking power, right there is a plain old ego desire. I appreciate the Feynmann quote Zen.
"So do not take the lecture too seriously, feeling that you really have to understand in terms of some model what I am going to describe, but just relax and enjoy it." Works for me. Reminds me of Alan Watts. I think I was taking Dr. Goswami's model more seriously than even he.
EDIT: That statement above was me being defensive. I think I should have said Amit's Model instead of understanding, I think that would be more appropriate because I can't get at his understanding because it's subjective... duh! I want to say I should have kept my opinion to myself and just stopped at the first post but that's just me damning myself. I'm trying be passionate while remaining compassionate. I was seeking power, right there is a plain old ego desire. I appreciate the Feynmann quote Zen.
"So do not take the lecture too seriously, feeling that you really have to understand in terms of some model what I am going to describe, but just relax and enjoy it." Works for me. Reminds me of Alan Watts. I think I was taking Dr. Goswami's model more seriously than even he.