Promoting 'Humane' treatment of 2D animals

[Diana]

I wonder if all 2D beings have free will or only those which are transitioning into 3d. For example, I have never felt bad about eating fish (as long as the water they lived in was cleanish.) It is obvious to me that cetaceans, apes, many or most dogs and cats, are not strictly 2D. Cetaceans may be completely 3d. Don't know exactly where the others on my list here fall.

The Bible would seem to suggest that Jesus ate fish - but who knows.

All life is sacred, and all things are connected as far as I can tell. For those who wish to move along the evolutionary path, and for those who think they are wanderers especially (who come from a more evolved dimension), it seems to me the respecting of all life would be basic. Therefore, the taking of any life for survival here in 3D (or 4D as the case may be at this point) would flow from a desire to do the least harm, and from the intention of moving toward higher densities. And the free will of a human, from the perspective of a higher evolutionary viewpoint, would be considered, but not to the exclusion of all else.

I think all life has free will, even if it is in a collective sense. Even a microbe moves this way or that. And in all things is the potential to evolve, which also suggests free will at any stage.

Whether there is any substance or truth in the bible is dubious to me, but as far as I know, Jesus was a fisherman of "people" or "souls." The idea of fish was probably metaphorical, and certainly the bible stories are allegorical.