(02-08-2009, 07:31 AM)Lavazza Wrote: But even if we disregard those percentages, when listening to the audio recordings of Q'uo sessions you will occasionally hear Carla say "We correct this instrument..." and she goes back to rephrase or clarify something that she messed up. If Carla were really interpreting the message wrong over these last few decades, I can't imagine that Q'uo would just sit around and let such an important note go uncorrected. They have an extreme polarization towards service towards others. If they let their message get so screwed up they would lose polarity quite quickly, and I suspect they wouldn't have allowed the communications to continue for very long at all.
That pretty much wraps it up for me.
(02-09-2009, 01:11 AM)airwaves Wrote: Quantum you are a very intelligent and powerful individual, and it is sightly overwhelming. That being the reason for my delay in response; for I may be above average in intelligence by human standards (not counting grammar :p) you must be quite the genius.
Good observation!
(02-09-2009, 01:11 AM)airwaves Wrote: ...I find it extremely difficult to believe that they would apply the law of confusion to this subject to such a degree.
Agreed!
(02-08-2009, 07:05 PM)Quantum Wrote: We as students of the LOO may all agree that "change is a comin", but need it entail death? My invitation stands: Why do we do this, and what does it say about the psychology of this, given that one may read into anything or read out of anything what one will. Why would one then hold fast and even argue fervently for it (death), and what does it say? Surely it bears looking at?
In all fairness, my understanding of those adhering to the 'spontaneous' theory is that they expect to be transported/uplifted/ascended/transmuted or by some other such mechanism into 4D reality, without the inconvenience of death of the physical vehicle. If anything, they are seeking to avoid death, in favor of the transformation of the 3D vehicle.
Which means...that they're not seeing the Oneness of Life...whether here in 3D reality or elsewhere, it's all good.
I think you ask a valid question, regarding the psychology of the choice of instantaneous vs gradual shift.
So why the preference? I've noticed that many a 'New Age' channel still fits their info into the 'rapture' allegorical structure...so the question is WHY is there such a yearning to be rescued?
It would seem to me that, on the surface, the adherence to a 'rescue' scenario, whether it's Jesus in the clouds, alien spaceships, or an instantaneous 'poof' in any case always seems to represent an attitude of expectance...that something will be done TO the person, rather than an embracing of one's power to decide for oneself one's reality...ie. passive rather than active...events happening TO the person instead of the person CREATING and manifesting those events.
I always go back to what Q'uo said, that, while activism might be wonderful for those who gravitate towards such, the single most important thing anyone can do to manifest 4D reality is to transmute their own negative emotions into LOVE...on a daily basis...Hence, the focus on some external phenomena or event transforming one's reality, rather than realizing the power inherent within, seems to indicate a refusal or denial of said power...and opportunity missed.