Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Spiritual Development & Metaphysical Matters Transition to Fourth Density has the Harvest FAILED?!

    Thread: has the Harvest FAILED?!


    untilbeyond (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 32
    Threads: 4
    Joined: Jan 2013
    #34
    05-13-2013, 03:54 PM
    Thank you Xise for the rich and thoughtful reply.

    I really appreciate feedback like this. I think you catch my drift that we (the positives as a whole) allow certain things to happen to allow the
    anti-conscious infra-structure to be sustained.

    After two decades of Ra assimilation, I have shifted somewhat from the
    STO/STS paradigm, to a simpler and to me, more elegant dichotomy, which becomes three-fold. Conscious, unconscious and anti-conscious.

    Anti-conscious intentions probably started at about the same time that conscious intentions started somewhere around the time of initial individuation.

    We're positives. We seek development of consciousness.

    The other team seeks to go against consciousness.


    For what purpose?

    Same as any other polarization. The play and display of the universe
    requires polarization. The anti-conscious forces present us with challenge which we use for our growth and development. That's a vital
    function, so it's built into nature.


    I have come to see humanity on this planet as 58% human and 40% humanoid and 2% "other." We all look similar. Our beings can be broken down into categories.

    If you live in the city, you will know which neighborhoods will have a cafe or shop where each and every person in that environment is humanoid.

    Then if you ever go to a store in a small town in a culturally backwards area, you can walk into a store and instantly feel that you are the only
    humanoid in that environment.


    It's not just a different psychological profile. It's not just a different chakra structure or way of spinning chakras, or the very sharp contrast in auric fields. The actual beingness of a human which this community classifies as non-wanderder, and I prefer the term human since they're the majority, is a different quality of beingness than what we experience.

    Ra has an explanation for this. Because we occupy space/time and time/space our ontological make-up is fundamentally different than
    those without the instinctual tendency to seek an internal interface
    and if possible some level of convergence with the knowing that's inherent within our being and our multi-dimensional nature.

    The non-humanoids, which I call humans, and Ra calls non-wanderers,
    are being quickened by having very close inter-personal relations
    with humanoids. They're also being preserved, as it's certainty that
    they would've self-destructed without us. Without us, their status is limited to easy pickings, period. Clearly, some crazy (hindsight is 20:20)
    wanderers objected to the extreme level of abuse and non-sovereignty
    and began a process at least 30,000 years ago that has escalated continuously ever since. Or maybe it wasn't crazy. Maybe all of that
    very hard work is starting to pan out. Clearly, there has to be some humans that have surrendered one way or another, enough to ready for something new and different. I find that a high percentage of humans
    are incapable of consciousness outside of the dominion of falsely identifying with body, situations, partner, money, etc. Clint Eastwood has shown an aptitude for awareness beyond ego. I can't think of another human who transcends ego as a force of habit. I do notice them flirting with the concept. A lot of them really love golf and find golf to be a spiritual high. And they aspire to improving their game, and so they are forced to examine their bad habits, and overcome them. You see them pursuing self-development along these lines.


    Yet the humans can very easily be duped by anti-conscious forces and personalities. It's too easy..... it's nothing but low-hanging fruit for the
    beings who seek the development and expansion of anti-conscious structures to promote enslavement.


    Humanoids did not wander to this reality. We were invited by friends who
    had already come here, and were requesting our assistance. Maybe the first few hundred humanoids to join humans literally wandered. Since then, we've been called, don't you think? Or in some cases we were travelers and in the process of exploring this galaxy we found this planet, and upon taking a closer look and communicating with regional deities we continued to learn about it and gradually formed agreements on the spirit planes to incarnate here.

    I think the attraction to the word wanderer is associated with the idea that we've strayed away from our comfort zone. It's got some coloration
    and judgment to it. Humanoid as a word has less coloration and less judgement. It also functions as a descriptive word that would include our status when we're back on our home density. If you call yourself a wanderer, then what are you when you're at home and not wandering?
    Do you see my point?

    I started my cycle on this planet near the end of Atlantis. I saw that humanoids were coming to chip in, and then getting quickly falling into unconscious states and buying into anti-conscious bullshit.

    That was my pull. Watching humanoids fall hard presses my buttons and invokes my desire to pitch in. Then I fall hard, and start begging my HD
    buddies for assistance. They've come because they love me and I begged them. None of them wandered!

    Over time, I've cultivated a dislike for most humans, only because the constant preference for the unconscious and anti-conscious tendencies
    gives me great fatigue. Off the top of my head, I can think of two humans that inspire me: Clint Eastwood and Michael Jordon.

    After that, I draw a blank. All of my heros, and all those who I admire most in the arts, sciences, business and philosophy are humanoid.

    All the experts in the UFO community have made it clear that there is something exceptional about this planet that attracts a lot of attention from extra-terrestrials from around the galaxy. However, the only way
    they ever pinpoint it is the typical references to the simultaneity of the age-change, the root-race change, and the density shift. What if the curiosity also pertained to how unusual it is to have more than two billion
    humanoid/wanderers embodied on a single planet in third density?

    Doesn't it seem probable that is highly unusual?


    I don't think it's natural for humans (what y'all refer to as non-wanderers)
    to polarize all the way to 95% negative. And the extreme measures taken by the forces against consciousness (what y'all call STS) have made it particularly unnatural for them to come up devoting 51% of their
    selves to serving others unless it's friends and family or at least community, which is essentially an extension of self. Some will seek to serve others by pushing their religious belief system on far-away communities.... like save-the-children programs that feed starving children to help them live and also help them convert to Jesus as their personal savior. The very concept of serving has so many grey areas if you're needing to make a distinction between positive and negative serving. I'm to the point where I find it unpractical to obsess on the distinction.

    Here's a much simpler set of distinctions:

    Conscious
    Unconscious
    Anti-conscious (represents a preference to go against consciousness)

    My bottom line?

    As humanoid/wanderers the service to this or that, self or others, is not
    a distinction that is relevant to us personally. We graduated to fourth density prior to starting a cycle on this planet. And getting humans to polarize one way or the other has reached a mexican stand-off. For them, 51% positive is ridiculous as is 95% negative.

    Also: Our main thrust is helping humanoids get activated. I own a wellness center that features affordable high-end bodywork. 99% of our regulars are humanoid. Humans will try us out and then figure out why we're not for them, or simply not feel drawn to returning. I can think of
    one human who is a regular out of several hundred.

    When I try to be helpful to a human (what y'all call non-wanderers) it's like trying to drive down a dead end street. It's difficult for me to validate their points of view even without any verbal communication, we already have that clash on a vibration level, so they will resist me since I find it difficult to fully collapse into their points of view. It's just not a fun dance. They can most effectively be coached by other humans (which y'all refer to as non-wanderers.) I will acknowledge that coaching humans is not my specialty, and I find that those who do a good job of coaching humans then make the mistake of treating humanoids like humans. Think of any book where the author required ten pages to communicate something that could be communicated to an activated humanoid in few sentences. It's unrealistic to be great at both, unless we're in the performing arts. The Matrix hit the sweet spot here. It had
    had mass appeal that succeeded in entertaining humans and humanoids.
    The Beatles also did this brilliantly.


    As a sub-culture within the 2.5 billion humanoids, this (Bring 4th) community is microscopic. My hope is the the lo0 body of information can be distilled and simplified into one single book that can be assimilated by at least 100 million of the 2.5 billion humanoids. As it is, it's very far from being ready for prime time.

    Instead of the word harvest, we could adapt the word graduation, and use the metaphor of finishing high-school and having numerous choices
    associated with that rite of passage. What we've done is analogous to going back to high-school after graduating college. And pretending like we never went to college.

    This stuff will never be mainstream. I know that. However, it could
    be converted into a linguistic and conceptual format that would go down
    easier with the typical non-activated humanoid/wanderer.

    Bare in mind, I'm 54 and my entire life has been devoted to applied philosophy for the purpose of developing conceptual art. Ra Material
    has percolated in my background thoughts for 19 years. So I'm at the
    stage of wishing to disseminate the paradigm.... and my criteria for proceeding pertains to the consideration of accessibility and refinement.

    Do any of you share in this interest?

    -Michael

    Btw, are any of you professional musicians or composers? I am looking for psychic composers to help me launch an entertainment R&D firm that
    will promote galactic shamanism through the performing arts. I'm currently working with an imaginary team (that could be more than imaginary) to develop a hip-hop opera set in 2033 that time travels
    back 300 years to examine the power of humanoids going through the
    various initiations associated with the Atlantic slave trade. My intention
    for this opera is for it to have a cultural impact similar to Tommy, Godspell and Jesus Christ Superstar 40+ years ago.

    I gave up on being a pro musician in my 20s. I had no idea that I have high-functioning autism, so I had no way to establish confidence given the awareness of that I could not do. I didn't discover my autism until age 49. Now, I've come to realize that I chose autism as a way to increase the odds of getting properly activated into my nature as a galactic shaman.

    I define my autism as a block between myself and myself. I have a very thin mix of my own being in my personal space with and around my physical being. A very large portion of myself was held back on 4D, where I attempt to guide my 3D expression. By sequestering such a large portion of myself on 4D, I created a way for a whole bunch of me to not collapse into unconscious patterns. I also set up a situation that would make it impossible to be arrogant. I sucked at way too many things to ever be arrogant.

    When I journey into my 4D perspective, it's a domain where math, poetry and scripture are unified, and the only question is how to merge all of that with song and dance.

    All I have to do is use my telepathy to hook up with my 4D consciousness, and I also strive stereo consciousness with a band-mate
    who I perform with on a higher plane. Together, they figure everything
    out, and the only job for my 3D beingness is to recieve and then transmit.

    I'm currently writing an e-book called 'Hold this vision.' In it, I explain my aspirations about codifying galactic shamanism through existing entertainment mediums of stage, film, theme parks, etc.

    My e-book will be released by Labor Day. It goes to the editor on June 1st. If any of you are involved in similar projects, let's network.

    Thanks for plowing through such a long post.... -M

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    has the Harvest FAILED?! - by freestonew - 04-09-2013, 05:33 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by AnthroHeart - 04-09-2013, 05:42 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by freestonew - 04-09-2013, 05:44 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Jeremy - 04-09-2013, 05:51 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by almostdone - 04-10-2013, 09:50 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Guardian - 04-09-2013, 05:56 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by GentleReckoning - 04-09-2013, 05:56 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Hototo - 04-10-2013, 01:53 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by xise - 04-10-2013, 12:29 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by 52midnight - 04-10-2013, 02:15 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by almostdone - 04-10-2013, 05:32 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Charles - 04-10-2013, 05:47 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by untilbeyond - 05-13-2013, 10:38 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by almostdone - 04-10-2013, 06:24 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by zenmaster - 04-10-2013, 08:58 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Hototo - 04-11-2013, 04:25 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by zenmaster - 04-11-2013, 06:56 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Hototo - 04-11-2013, 06:59 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by zenmaster - 04-11-2013, 07:06 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Hototo - 04-11-2013, 08:10 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by almostdone - 04-11-2013, 09:37 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Charles - 04-11-2013, 03:34 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by hogey11 - 04-11-2013, 04:06 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Alex from Greece - 04-12-2013, 07:05 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by kainous - 04-13-2013, 09:23 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Ellai - 04-21-2013, 06:50 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Dinko - 04-26-2013, 02:47 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by untilbeyond - 05-08-2013, 11:50 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by kainous - 05-09-2013, 08:27 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by GentleReckoning - 05-09-2013, 11:09 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by untilbeyond - 05-11-2013, 09:50 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by reeay - 05-10-2013, 01:13 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by untilbeyond - 05-10-2013, 10:14 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by xise - 05-12-2013, 12:38 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by untilbeyond - 05-13-2013, 03:54 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by AnthroHeart - 05-13-2013, 04:21 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Plenum - 05-13-2013, 04:26 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Charles - 05-13-2013, 05:05 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by AnthroHeart - 05-13-2013, 05:12 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by xise - 05-16-2013, 03:47 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by untilbeyond - 05-16-2013, 04:37 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by xise - 05-16-2013, 07:11 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by untilbeyond - 05-16-2013, 11:21 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by xise - 05-17-2013, 01:54 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Wai - 05-17-2013, 08:57 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by native - 06-22-2013, 11:29 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by GentleReckoning - 05-17-2013, 02:28 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Hototo - 05-17-2013, 02:33 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by reeay - 05-17-2013, 04:28 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by droppen - 06-22-2013, 01:20 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by untilbeyond - 06-25-2013, 10:38 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by AnthroHeart - 06-25-2013, 11:12 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by untilbeyond - 06-25-2013, 04:42 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Hototo - 06-22-2013, 03:03 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by AnthroHeart - 06-25-2013, 05:38 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Philosoraptor - 06-29-2013, 12:32 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Hototo - 06-30-2013, 05:40 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by AnthroHeart - 07-01-2013, 01:20 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by GentleReckoning - 06-30-2013, 07:43 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Parsons - 06-30-2013, 08:10 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by xise - 07-01-2013, 12:52 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Hototo - 07-01-2013, 03:04 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by BrownEye - 07-11-2013, 10:11 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by zenmaster - 07-11-2013, 10:30 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by BrownEye - 07-11-2013, 10:41 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by zenmaster - 07-12-2013, 12:07 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Philosoraptor - 07-12-2013, 09:54 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by zenmaster - 07-12-2013, 09:10 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by xise - 07-12-2013, 09:55 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by zenmaster - 07-12-2013, 10:09 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Parsons - 07-12-2013, 05:01 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by zenmaster - 07-12-2013, 08:17 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Guardian - 07-12-2013, 09:52 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by xise - 07-12-2013, 10:20 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by zenmaster - 07-12-2013, 10:28 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by xise - 07-12-2013, 11:07 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by zenmaster - 07-12-2013, 11:30 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by darklight - 08-12-2013, 01:54 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Hototo - 08-13-2013, 02:50 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Rake - 08-13-2013, 07:39 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by zenmaster - 08-13-2013, 08:15 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by Rake - 08-13-2013, 10:02 AM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by darklight - 08-25-2013, 06:06 PM
    RE: has the Harvest FAILED?! - by AnthroHeart - 09-02-2013, 05:20 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode