Seeing an Individual in a Group of Individuals

[Adonai One]

I just wish to argue towards the nature of power and towards the notion that the Executive branch of any legal system usually holds all the power. All else is usually fluff.

---

So how about such 'laws' as the laws of physics? In a universe with no innate rules there sure seems to be a lot of order.

These laws are applied equitably without any possible holes. Illusory laws applied by humans are easily evaded by those with more power than others and are subject to bias and corruption.

Humans cannot create laws like natural laws. They can only create the illusion of them until they are inevitably broken by a higher power.

Would you say that morals are an "unnatural" law?

Yes, they are completely subjective. As for the barometers for polarity, the desire for control as opposed to love for others can be quantified in some metaphysical way. Beyond that, these barometers do not limit nor intervene.

Contrived morals by legal systems are not like physics.

I am confused, you have not been restricted in any way from pursuing your own endeavours by the rules of the forum. It seems you equate the presentation of the exploration with the exploration itself.

I have been restricted from communicating with others about my channeling who are willing to accept such service.

Presentation can make the difference between a successful product and a failing one.

---

Now something I am wondering, do rules REALLY limit you so much?

No matter how minor the enslavement, it has net effects on society. Rules can lead to higher food prices and people working much harder than they should. It can lead to very undesriable effects. However, that's on a governmental level.

I am not willing to accept enslavement as a byproduct of rules. People think I am being melodramatic but humans with power can make life pretty bad. Of course I can survive anything but I will have my preferences.

The rules here limited me in so far that I cannot pursue channeling through my close relationships with my preferred entities.

So, yes. they limit me. Of course there are infinite possibilities but that's not relevant. You can use that argument to justify absolute tyranny.

Also, human laws are not like natural laws. Humans laws are bypassed by higher powers.

We are a force in this world, gentlemen. We can help shape the world to what we wish it to be or we can stand by and submit to any given force. Are you willing to accept enslavement? I am not.

Why are you so convinced that others have power over you? I'm not willing to accept enslavement, and that's fine because I'm not a slave.

You don't get freedom from any source other than yourself. I consider myself free, and it is so.

I would rather accept what the world offers to me in an attitude of good faith and allow it to be transformed THROUGH me rather than seek to transform it simply to suit my purposes.

I was convinced when little girls have to apply for business permits to start a lemonade stand. When police officers shoot barking dogs on sight because it violates their personal safety. When protestors are mauled because they are unhappy with their governments.

I cannot start businesses without forcibly giving my labor to the state which in turn is used to fund wars.

I can find freedom despite this but don't tell me I am unilaterally free in my ability to serve humanity. Do not tell me I am not enslaved by this entire paradigm.

It's easy to think you are free as an employee. But when you want to own your businesses, your own enterprises and be a leader in the world, you are nearly stopped at every corner and you have to ask for permission to do just simple things.

We live in a slave state. It's not chattel slavery but it's coercive.

This planet burdens the innovators of this world. I intend to innovate and I will despite the coercion. But do not tell me the coercion does not exist.

---

Cop-out of what? Being enslaved? I am confused aha

The illusion. We are not here to be dead. We are here to work through our bodies. There is nothing wrong to desire freedom as we are incarnate. This desire should not just be thrown aside.