Solipsism

[Sagittarius]

Yay, words!

I think solipsism is a wonderful reality for those who wish to experience the perception of the self in such a way. I think it could be said that it is true, but the challenge comes, for me, when we apply that to every self. What is the real difference between saying the self is made of everything, and thus is quantified by the infinity of "everything" meaning energy throughout all forms, objects, creatures, minerals, atoms, etc, and that everything is made of the self?

The latter suggests that both self and other self are quantified in the same way. That everything has everything and is everything. So, in that regard, all selves are equal, however, even if you say it is just an infinite self of infinite forms, that stills means everything has to be something that is a part of the self.

I started deeply pondering this a few years back because I was trying to identify how objects retain their forms. This is how I came to the concept of a fractalized unified field of perception, like the Net of Indra or the Flower of Life.

Do I make everything stay as it, and make it as it is? Sure, some part of myself, but what I am currently concerned with and aware of is my conscious self. My conscious self observes, but I assure you I spend no time calculating the infinite functions required to attain a state of observation.

My brain just had a seizure reading that hehe. Reminds me of trying to learn paradiddles on the drum kit.