I don't think that the scientific community would find it hard to accept (except for some hard-liners). In fact, I'll go farther by asking what is Ra's definition of a photon. Scientists already know that energy packets encircling (binding with their wavefunctions) each other causes matter. However, I think the hardest thing will be understanding what each of the fields truly are.
A good example would be a electron and anti-electron annihilation, producing two gamma rays (photons of a high-frequency), and the fact that two photons can indeed combine in the right circumstances to reproduce an electron-anti-electron pair. Go a bit further, and you will find that given enough catalysts (high energy bombardment), particles will transform into all sorts of things.
Regarding Adonai's skepticism about Larson, he's right that there is an insufficient description of the theory for it to mean anything. It's grossly incomplete (maybe not rubbish though), and is analogous to describing the earth as a big blue marble. It's a great mental image, but really doesn't explain it well.
A good example would be a electron and anti-electron annihilation, producing two gamma rays (photons of a high-frequency), and the fact that two photons can indeed combine in the right circumstances to reproduce an electron-anti-electron pair. Go a bit further, and you will find that given enough catalysts (high energy bombardment), particles will transform into all sorts of things.
Regarding Adonai's skepticism about Larson, he's right that there is an insufficient description of the theory for it to mean anything. It's grossly incomplete (maybe not rubbish though), and is analogous to describing the earth as a big blue marble. It's a great mental image, but really doesn't explain it well.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)