The final months of 2013

[GentleReckoning]

Forgive me, I'm not sure I'm familiar with the term "positive catalyst" (and perhaps "negative catalyst")? If someone could be so kind as to explain.

Edit: Ok found an explanation! I still need to finish book 4! Anyway, question withdrawn

94.12 Questioner: It seems to me that the Experience of the Mind would act in such a way as to change the nature of the veil so that catalyst would be filtered so as to be more acceptable in the bias that is increasingly chosen by the entity. For instance, if the entity had chosen the right-hand path the Experience of the Mind would change the permeability of the veil to accept more and more positive catalyst, and also the other would be true for accepting more negative if the left-hand path were the one that was repeatedly chosen. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is not only correct but there is a further ramification. As the entity increases in experience it shall, more and more, choose positive interpretations of catalyst if it is upon the service-to-others path and negative interpretations of catalyst if its experience has been along the service-to-self path.

94.14 Questioner: I can understand, to use a poor term again, the necessity for an archetype for Catalyst or a model for Catalyst of the Mind, but what is the reason for having a blueprint or model for Experience of the Mind other than this simple model of the dual repository for the negative and positive catalyst? It would seem to me that the first distortion of free will would be better served if no model for experience were made. I’m somewhat confused on this. Could you clear it up?

Ra: I am Ra. Your question is certainly interesting and your confusion hopefully productive. We cannot learn/teach for the student. We shall simply note, as we have previously, the attraction of various archetypes to male and to female. We suggest that this line of consideration may prove productive.

Passages like this really make me wish just a little more learn/teaching had been done with this particular group of entities.

---

Chuckling at the notion that these thoroughly new-age framed remarkes were not an integral part of the meme. All the hallmarks present, even use of borrowed terminology and ad hoc neologisms to convey apprehensions from lopsided intuitive perception. Exaggeration, magical thinking, self-fulfilling prophecy (framing), etc. Give credit where it's due.

Feel free to comment on your own life experience instead of judging others admittedly subjective experience. Exaggerating the positive, reframing the negative, and believing that it's all part of a grand intelligent plan sounds like an incredibly effective way to maximize positive catalyst.

Anything and everything anyone does sounds like an incredibly effective way to maximize positive catalyst. Easy is it not.

Yes, but the mental models and tools you mentioned are some of the most effective methods for increasing positive catalyst. Thusly am I confused as to what you are communicating.

Each of the things that you mention can be used or mis-used by an individual to increase their perception of negative/positive catalyst. Your choice of adjectives lead me to believe that you subjectively believe that they are objectively not useful for this purpose.