When you speak of rejecting catalyst, what does rejection entail?
If I become paralyzed due to a physical injury severing all nerves and all movement below the neck, isn't possible to use that experience to increase one's yellow to manifest a future where they become one of the rare .01% healings - by keeping at the physical therapy, year after year. Isn't it also possible to use that experience primarily to accept the paralyzation (orange/green) and then focus one's life to matters that do not require movement? I'm thinking Stephen Hawkings-type situation here (though his was disease related, and probably pre-incarnative, but assuming it wasn't for the purposes of another example).
The example is just an example. But it seems, at first glance, there are many, many types of lessons one can draw from any given catalyst. Those involving primarily the yellow ray are usually more control/power oriented. Those primarily involving the green ray seem more acceptance oriented. There can be overlap as it is possible to accept the present and manifest one's different future I believe, but the question remains - aren't there multiple lessons for each and every catalyst? Certainly, after a series of catalysts, each subsequent catalyst will conform to addressing imbalances that continue to exist, but for any given catalyst, can the lessons not be chosen on a spectrum? There might be one perfect answer to each and every catalyst involving multiple concepts, but can't we select a focus on which concept to learn at any given time? I mean, I understand we're talking about infinity, unity, but for the reality on the ground of day to day catalyst, isn't there something to be said of the an analysis of a "pretty good" response and learning to catalyst instead of the "perfect" answer (where everyone possible imbalance the catalyst raises is immediately addressed)?
And I'm taking about non-incarnatively chosen catalysts, because as I understand there are different rules in play for pre-incarnative choices.
If I become paralyzed due to a physical injury severing all nerves and all movement below the neck, isn't possible to use that experience to increase one's yellow to manifest a future where they become one of the rare .01% healings - by keeping at the physical therapy, year after year. Isn't it also possible to use that experience primarily to accept the paralyzation (orange/green) and then focus one's life to matters that do not require movement? I'm thinking Stephen Hawkings-type situation here (though his was disease related, and probably pre-incarnative, but assuming it wasn't for the purposes of another example).
The example is just an example. But it seems, at first glance, there are many, many types of lessons one can draw from any given catalyst. Those involving primarily the yellow ray are usually more control/power oriented. Those primarily involving the green ray seem more acceptance oriented. There can be overlap as it is possible to accept the present and manifest one's different future I believe, but the question remains - aren't there multiple lessons for each and every catalyst? Certainly, after a series of catalysts, each subsequent catalyst will conform to addressing imbalances that continue to exist, but for any given catalyst, can the lessons not be chosen on a spectrum? There might be one perfect answer to each and every catalyst involving multiple concepts, but can't we select a focus on which concept to learn at any given time? I mean, I understand we're talking about infinity, unity, but for the reality on the ground of day to day catalyst, isn't there something to be said of the an analysis of a "pretty good" response and learning to catalyst instead of the "perfect" answer (where everyone possible imbalance the catalyst raises is immediately addressed)?
And I'm taking about non-incarnatively chosen catalysts, because as I understand there are different rules in play for pre-incarnative choices.