A spell that gives freewill to animals or other 2nd-density beings: TRUCENDUM

[Adonai One]

Have you seen any results in utilization of this on a beloved 2nd density being?

I only ask because I have been attempting to invest our beloved cat, Screwdriver, for quite some time.

I have only begun applying it for a day. I will share what happens in the future. It could be unrelated but he now sleeps on my pants... He hasn't done that before.

If you change the spell from a 2nd-density being to a 3rd-density being one, what would happen?

"A spell that give positive (or negative) polarity to 3rd density beings"

Is this not robbing the free will of the One Creator somewhere?

An infringement on the Law of Freewill would likely occur due to the entity being fully capable of choice. It is my distortion/belief that you cannot rob freewill from a being that does not fully have it. You can only give it the ability to make a choice, as I wish to do.

What's the difference with any other densities being?

It is my distortion/belief that orange-ray life has no will and is without polarity. My act is without standard polarity for I am not affecting choice but making it available which I find to be a positively polarizing act, as it unifies creation upwards. Animals have yellow-ray souls in potentiality but they are not capable of "The Choice" without complete self-awareness. I believe I am only affecting the Sun and the Earth's rate of birthing of fully aware souls, which I find to be a form of service.

While I appreciate the thought and idea here, I do not quite follow the methodology. Perhaps you can explain the reasoning behind your approach?

I find freewill way of self-awareness is what defines a fully activated mind/body/spirit complex according to Ra's distortions/beliefs. The investment of this freewill is mainly dependent on investment by the Sun and other beings. I simply wish to accelerate this process and enable the macrocosmic to have more self-aware, choice-capable souls in order to give the creator more dynamic experiences.

I wish to ask a question in regards to this statement:

Free will never needs to be given, it need only be accepted and allowed to thrive.

Is a young-souled animal even capable of acceptance, much less rejection? Is not freewill given by the very nature of the investment Ra describes, through the sub-logos and us?