12-22-2013, 06:08 PM
Ankh brought up this point a couple of months ago in reply to one of my threads. I noticed there was a difference in interpretation, and I am more leaning towards her view of things, after some delay in acknowledging the catalyst 
this is the passage, and my question follows:
now, I had always put much more emphasis on the bit in bold, which I read as:
1) everyone makes planetary contributions, but for someone with blue ray activation, they can actually appreciate (acknowledge) that this takes place (so less need to be all pro-active and organising, although there may be situations where this is needed and required).
where Ankh's reading or interpretation seemed to suggest that:
2) only when you are blue ray activated, are these 'invisble' contributions made.
with the full passage in mind, and perhaps with the full context of Ra's explanation of the energy centres, what's your view on this?
the 'by the quality of its being' seems an interesting point. Is your 'quality of being' your particular home vibrations? ie the spirit complex being expressed into this planet's energetic web, as Ra has used the term.
"65.11 It was the aim of Wanderers to serve the entities of this planet in whatever way was requested and it was also the aim of Wanderers that their vibratory patterns might lighten the planetary vibration as a whole, thus ameliorating the effects of planetary disharmony and palliating any results of this disharmony."
is this more a passive effect, or something that has to be consciously realised so that the passive effect can be expressed? ie the raising of the kundalini and whatnot.
this is the passage, and my question follows:
Quote:Ra: I am Ra. This is incorrect. To a mind/body/spirit complex which is starving, the appropriate response is the feeding of the body. You may extrapolate from this.
On the other hand, however, you are correct in your assumption that the green ray response is not as refined as that which has been imbued with wisdom.
This wisdom enables the entity to appreciate its contributions to the planetary consciousness by the quality of its being without regard to activity or behavior which expects results upon visible planes.
now, I had always put much more emphasis on the bit in bold, which I read as:
1) everyone makes planetary contributions, but for someone with blue ray activation, they can actually appreciate (acknowledge) that this takes place (so less need to be all pro-active and organising, although there may be situations where this is needed and required).
where Ankh's reading or interpretation seemed to suggest that:
2) only when you are blue ray activated, are these 'invisble' contributions made.
with the full passage in mind, and perhaps with the full context of Ra's explanation of the energy centres, what's your view on this?
the 'by the quality of its being' seems an interesting point. Is your 'quality of being' your particular home vibrations? ie the spirit complex being expressed into this planet's energetic web, as Ra has used the term.
"65.11 It was the aim of Wanderers to serve the entities of this planet in whatever way was requested and it was also the aim of Wanderers that their vibratory patterns might lighten the planetary vibration as a whole, thus ameliorating the effects of planetary disharmony and palliating any results of this disharmony."
is this more a passive effect, or something that has to be consciously realised so that the passive effect can be expressed? ie the raising of the kundalini and whatnot.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)