01-29-2014, 02:19 PM
(01-29-2014, 01:45 PM)zenmaster Wrote: More specifically, why is there the appeal to an intermediate personality to intercede, on our own behalf, in order to provide info of such a personal nature. In other words, why develop an external "counterpart" messenger instead of direct, honest reflection. I agree, there are some opportunities for self exploration which are not provided by the societal mind which channeling may offer (i.e. due to response to a calling). However, why the more available, obvious existential conditions require illumination and framing by that which is transcendent (channeled entities) begs the question of what that surrogated role is actually reflecting internally as far as ability and willingness to be honest with self.
Agreed. In all cases the catalyst is a mirror.
Whether AO's messages are another entity, or the subconscious, is irrelevant. Either way, the catalyst produced is allowing for reflection and expansion. It's valid.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)