05-17-2010, 03:39 AM
I completely agree with Monica. I am new to Bring4th, I have been lurking for a month or so and I look forward to joining in the discussions here. I just finished reading an old thread titled 'unbelievable moon bases and wrong science', the subject of both of these threads are an active catalyst for me today. A friend from another site on which I comment and have contributed, upon googling a term from something I wrote, found lawofone.info and began asking me questions about the Law of One.
I should interject here that I only found the Ra sessions and the LOO about 6 or 7 weeks ago. Considering the amount of research, seeking, and purely synchronistic revelations I have experienced over the last 25+ years, it is beyond comprehension that I never ever ran across it before now. When I stumbled across the Ra Sessions, the resonance was so significant I was literally brought to tears by the intensity. The words 'that explains EVERYTHING' echo through my psyche still today. Systematically, (in the organic whole system sense) the knowledge necessary to lay the foundation for the Law of One has been planted, grown, cultivated, nurtured and finally matured in my eventual alignment with third density day to day life which has occured simultaneously with my understanding and psychic detachment from the construct on which it is built. Then I found the Ra Sessions.
As I have studied LOO it has occured to me that if a person did not have in their arsenal the vast and varied knowledge I have explored and come to terms with, it would be quite a leap of faith to delve into the Ra sessions. As I have read scattered posts in these forums, I had begun to think that people participating in wanderer discussions must all feel the kind of resonance I do; this notion was strengenthed by the idea expressed by Carla in the Wanderer Handbook and elsewhere, that if you have found this knowledge then you are probably a wanderer or you woulndt be here.
Back to the matter at hand; studying the Law of One has given me new vocabulary to discuss universal concepts that I have been developing over many years. This has become apparent in my comments on a site unrelated to the Law of One. I have discussed many concepts of the Law for a while now in that forum, before I actually found the Ra sessions, and I was unsure of the receptiveness of the group to the knowledge in the context of channeling sessions, thus I had not yet discussed the specifics of my newfound understanding. In email correspondence the founder requested more information about the material and how it has affected my life. I replied with some Ra material, links, and a little personal chatter-then today I got an email which blew my mind. He, in the same paragraph, says he would like to learn more, but that it seemed like some kind of spiritual class system, in which souls are at different levels and how that did not jive with the concept of infinity, and that he has issues with religion and 'things like this, that we should be weary of taking literally". And since I said the teachings were a deeper understanding of things I already knew, he had a problem with that too, how can some group say they know something that is already known, how can they claim to have answers.
I tried to direct him initially to sections that would give introduction, and I even gave him links to other sites which the information may be more easily read. I did however say that I knew with every fiber of my being that these are the answers for which I have sought, and that somehow got twisted around into him referring to the Law of One in a way which actually initially offended me. Not offended me, personally, but I was so hesitant to expose this knowledge that is so sacred to me to the critique of someone who does not yet have the groundwork laid for acceptance, and only began to at repeated request, and look what happened.
In a phenomenon that I have been experiencing almost daily on Bring4th, my first click on the recent posts took me right to a thread which directly addresses an active catalyst or responds to a theme which I happen to be entertaining at any given time.
While the posts have assured me that total acceptance is not required nor is it common, my original conundrum of how to proceed has become slightly more paradoxical. He obviously hasn't thoroughly examined the information I sent him, and I am unsure of how much of the sessions he has looked at, but it isnt much because he also asked for clarification on what harvest was. The whole angle of approach seems skewed by his comments, which are very different from any prior statements concerning LOO.
I started to respond starting by saying that the Ra Sessions don't seem to resonate with you at this time, because of the fact that you have referred to them as a type of dangerous religion to be weary of literal interpetration, I would not endeavor to convince you differently -(or something like that). He says in the email-I believe this, and I believe that, its all unknown totally and there is no way to find out. I guess it would have been helpful to learn of his position on communications from Confederation members prior to freaking him out-I think. It seems to me that arguing or debating over the core knowledge set of the Ra sessions with someone who does not accept the basic validity of the channel, is not only futile, but in violation of the Law of Confusion (free will).
Or is it a failure to perform service to others by not providing him more explanation on a subject that he has requested more understanding of?
I should interject here that I only found the Ra sessions and the LOO about 6 or 7 weeks ago. Considering the amount of research, seeking, and purely synchronistic revelations I have experienced over the last 25+ years, it is beyond comprehension that I never ever ran across it before now. When I stumbled across the Ra Sessions, the resonance was so significant I was literally brought to tears by the intensity. The words 'that explains EVERYTHING' echo through my psyche still today. Systematically, (in the organic whole system sense) the knowledge necessary to lay the foundation for the Law of One has been planted, grown, cultivated, nurtured and finally matured in my eventual alignment with third density day to day life which has occured simultaneously with my understanding and psychic detachment from the construct on which it is built. Then I found the Ra Sessions.
As I have studied LOO it has occured to me that if a person did not have in their arsenal the vast and varied knowledge I have explored and come to terms with, it would be quite a leap of faith to delve into the Ra sessions. As I have read scattered posts in these forums, I had begun to think that people participating in wanderer discussions must all feel the kind of resonance I do; this notion was strengenthed by the idea expressed by Carla in the Wanderer Handbook and elsewhere, that if you have found this knowledge then you are probably a wanderer or you woulndt be here.
Back to the matter at hand; studying the Law of One has given me new vocabulary to discuss universal concepts that I have been developing over many years. This has become apparent in my comments on a site unrelated to the Law of One. I have discussed many concepts of the Law for a while now in that forum, before I actually found the Ra sessions, and I was unsure of the receptiveness of the group to the knowledge in the context of channeling sessions, thus I had not yet discussed the specifics of my newfound understanding. In email correspondence the founder requested more information about the material and how it has affected my life. I replied with some Ra material, links, and a little personal chatter-then today I got an email which blew my mind. He, in the same paragraph, says he would like to learn more, but that it seemed like some kind of spiritual class system, in which souls are at different levels and how that did not jive with the concept of infinity, and that he has issues with religion and 'things like this, that we should be weary of taking literally". And since I said the teachings were a deeper understanding of things I already knew, he had a problem with that too, how can some group say they know something that is already known, how can they claim to have answers.
I tried to direct him initially to sections that would give introduction, and I even gave him links to other sites which the information may be more easily read. I did however say that I knew with every fiber of my being that these are the answers for which I have sought, and that somehow got twisted around into him referring to the Law of One in a way which actually initially offended me. Not offended me, personally, but I was so hesitant to expose this knowledge that is so sacred to me to the critique of someone who does not yet have the groundwork laid for acceptance, and only began to at repeated request, and look what happened.
In a phenomenon that I have been experiencing almost daily on Bring4th, my first click on the recent posts took me right to a thread which directly addresses an active catalyst or responds to a theme which I happen to be entertaining at any given time.
While the posts have assured me that total acceptance is not required nor is it common, my original conundrum of how to proceed has become slightly more paradoxical. He obviously hasn't thoroughly examined the information I sent him, and I am unsure of how much of the sessions he has looked at, but it isnt much because he also asked for clarification on what harvest was. The whole angle of approach seems skewed by his comments, which are very different from any prior statements concerning LOO.
I started to respond starting by saying that the Ra Sessions don't seem to resonate with you at this time, because of the fact that you have referred to them as a type of dangerous religion to be weary of literal interpetration, I would not endeavor to convince you differently -(or something like that). He says in the email-I believe this, and I believe that, its all unknown totally and there is no way to find out. I guess it would have been helpful to learn of his position on communications from Confederation members prior to freaking him out-I think. It seems to me that arguing or debating over the core knowledge set of the Ra sessions with someone who does not accept the basic validity of the channel, is not only futile, but in violation of the Law of Confusion (free will).
Or is it a failure to perform service to others by not providing him more explanation on a subject that he has requested more understanding of?