02-19-2014, 08:31 AM
Hi,
On the second paragraph of the Introduction the Ra Material, Professor Don Elkins says:
"Since our experimental work began, and even before we officially formed a
research group, there was considerable confusion about the nature of our
research. I would like to state that I consider my point of view to be purely
scientific. Many readers of this material have used as a basis for its
evaluation a previously assumed philosophical bias which has ranged from
what I would call objectively scientific to subjectively theological. It is not
the purpose of our research group to attempt to do anything other than
make experimental data available. Each reader will undoubtedly reach his
own unique conclusion about the meaning of this body of data."
As Professor Elkins did (I suppose), I do believe in God, telephaty, intelligent life in other planets, channeling, Larson's Reciprocal System, spirits..., but our discussion here is other and I would like to call your attention to how serious it is.
My questioning on the Law of One, the basement of the Ra Material, is logical and applicable to any cientific experiment data analysis:
- There is no effect without cause.
- A cause must preceed its effect(s).
- Cause and effect must be distinct each other.
As I said before, I would like to receive a logical answer from Mrs Rueckert and her group that are studying and divulgating the Ra Material since 1982.
Thank you again.
On the second paragraph of the Introduction the Ra Material, Professor Don Elkins says:
"Since our experimental work began, and even before we officially formed a
research group, there was considerable confusion about the nature of our
research. I would like to state that I consider my point of view to be purely
scientific. Many readers of this material have used as a basis for its
evaluation a previously assumed philosophical bias which has ranged from
what I would call objectively scientific to subjectively theological. It is not
the purpose of our research group to attempt to do anything other than
make experimental data available. Each reader will undoubtedly reach his
own unique conclusion about the meaning of this body of data."
As Professor Elkins did (I suppose), I do believe in God, telephaty, intelligent life in other planets, channeling, Larson's Reciprocal System, spirits..., but our discussion here is other and I would like to call your attention to how serious it is.
My questioning on the Law of One, the basement of the Ra Material, is logical and applicable to any cientific experiment data analysis:
- There is no effect without cause.
- A cause must preceed its effect(s).
- Cause and effect must be distinct each other.
As I said before, I would like to receive a logical answer from Mrs Rueckert and her group that are studying and divulgating the Ra Material since 1982.
Thank you again.