02-22-2014, 11:18 PM
Quote:It does not seem possible that the intention of .0000002 % of people can deny all of the polarization efforts of almost everyone else, regardless of means/opportunities used to polarize. Further, the devices are a rather recent thing compared to the time people have had to polarize - so the intention would have to not only inhibit progress in removing distortions, but to depolarize those already polarized as well.I'm having trouble with this as well. Also, it's interesting that in the original quote "this further muddles the vibratory nexus of your social memory complex, causing a situation whereby neither those oriented towards serving others nor those oriented towards serving self can gain the energy/power which opens the gates to intelligent infinity for the social memory complex. This in turn causes the harvest to be small."
Since when have we had a smc? Does this imply that a smc exists in potential as soon as a collective or societal mind is established and can reach higher thresholds of actualization?