03-24-2014, 01:30 AM
(03-24-2014, 12:33 AM)xise Wrote: Zm, you do realize your language can push people away, right?Because it's a completely valid and useful point Xise. If you present an ambiguous option which appeals to infinity, a non-ambiguous option which does not appeal to infinity will find its place.
There are many ways to say something without causing personal catalyst due to language choice. Just an observation from my personal experience: I used to use similar language to yours below when I wanted to get under the skin of a witness on cross-examination.
zenmaster Wrote: I'm thinking this is reeking of incipient paranoia and the unhealthy framing can only lead to yet more difficulties (to blame on others...). You kinda have a history of buying into imaginative, fantasy notions (i.e. not being around after 2012 cause that was supposed to be harvest time) and[u] it would be sad to see you actually being carried away past the point of no return.
(03-24-2014, 12:04 AM)zenmaster Wrote:(03-23-2014, 11:46 PM)Parsons Wrote: You can't experience both 'worlds'? You can't directly experience one reality while casually observing the other?Earth calling Parsons..that's all things in potential, where we don't even have identity. Meanwhile, there is the formation of the viewpoint or polarity, balancing opposites, etc. Also why would you want to regress to the viewpoint of a confused child?
Are you not all things‽‽‽‽
Infinity can only unfold in the relative balance provided and if you say or imply something is actually some way, then you've just doomed yourself. You would, of course, not want to regress to the viewpoint of a confused child and you may want to consider why not rather than getting all caught up in identification with silly notions.