Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Community Art, Media, & Entertainment a bit of love for Scott Mandelker

    Thread: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker


    zenmaster (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 5,541
    Threads: 132
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #31
    03-31-2014, 02:03 AM
    (03-31-2014, 12:34 AM)6D longing Wrote:
    (03-30-2014, 03:55 PM)zenmaster Wrote: Listened to the first session. Somehow Mandelker translated "This Confederation works with the planetary spheres of seven of your galaxies, if you will, and is responsible for the callings of the densities of these galaxies." to mean that the seven solar systems represent the seven chakras. I'm not seeing that connection at all.

    He also suggested that Ra had conflated the term solar system and galaxy, yet Ra knew of the differences very well and insisted on using the term galaxy due to their experience with time/space.

    Also he said that dual activated types on Earth were 4D wanderers. Yet Ra says that the dual-activated are 4D native.

    Some clarifications here:

    1. I never intended to imply the seven solar systems equate to the seven chakras -- I said that the seven solar systems can be thought of as 7 chakras in a unified collective being of these 7 solar systems.
    How so?

    (03-31-2014, 12:34 AM)6D longing Wrote: 2. I am not implying Ra misunderstands ("conflates," i.e. mistakes) the difference between galaxy and solar system, I simply said they've used the term galaxy for what we term solar system:

    16.35 [Ra identifies their term-usage as indicating our solar system, and recognizes alternate human-usage]
    Ra: I am Ra. I see the confusion. We have difficulty with your language. The galaxy term must be split. We call galaxy that vibrational complex that is local. Thus, your sun is what we would call the center of a galaxy. We see you have another meaning for this term.

    10.16 [Ra affirms their term-usage to indicate both single & multiple planetary/solar "groups" or systems]
    Ra: I am Ra. We use the term known to your people by the sound vibration complex “galaxy.” We accept that some galaxies contain one system of planetary and solar groups, others containing several.
    Yes there is no term in our language yet for time/space grouping.

    (03-31-2014, 12:34 AM)6D longing Wrote: 3. Of course, the double-bodied or dual-activated entities are native to 4D, and being here incarnate, can surely be deemed "wanderers."

    63.13 [Ra identifies entities incarnating with "double body in activation" as "fourth density entities"]
    Ra: I am Ra. These entities are those incarnating with what you may call a double body in activation. It will be noted that the entities birthing these fourth-density entities experience a great feeling of, shall we say, the connection and the use of spiritual energies during pregnancy. This is due to the necessity for manifesting the double body.

    I'm not sure how much of this is quibbling due to the relative unimportance of this info, but Ra was indeed explicit that the dual-activated types are not Wanderers. If not Wanderers, a more appropriate terminology might be something like "transplants", due to development occurring under a different sub-logos. Of course during the ongoing local harvest, a small portion of dual-activated would be native as well.

    "63.15 Questioner: Would the purpose in transitioning to Earth prior to the complete changeover then be for the experience to be gained here during the harvesting process?

    Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. These entities are not Wanderers in the sense that this planetary sphere is their fourth-density home planet. However, the experience of this service is earned only by those harvested third-density entities which have demonstrated a great deal of orientation towards service to others. It is a privilege to be allowed this early an incarnation as there is much experiential catalyst in service to other-selves at this harvesting."

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Plenum - 05-27-2013, 04:44 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Jerome - 05-28-2013, 05:06 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Spaced - 05-28-2013, 05:10 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by marielle - 05-28-2013, 09:45 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by BrownEye - 06-27-2013, 09:06 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by βαθμιαίος - 05-28-2013, 05:34 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Aloneness - 05-29-2013, 11:19 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Aloneness - 05-29-2013, 01:18 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by reeay - 05-29-2013, 01:46 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Plenum - 05-29-2013, 03:33 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by reeay - 05-29-2013, 04:57 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Plenum - 06-26-2013, 11:01 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Jeremy - 06-26-2013, 11:19 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by jivatman - 10-30-2013, 12:49 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Plenum - 10-30-2013, 04:08 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by isis - 10-30-2013, 11:58 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Plenum - 10-30-2013, 01:57 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by isis - 10-30-2013, 02:13 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Plenum - 10-30-2013, 02:55 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Plenum - 01-25-2014, 12:19 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by βαθμιαίος - 01-26-2014, 10:47 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Plenum - 03-29-2014, 05:42 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by reeay - 03-29-2014, 06:06 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by AnthroHeart - 03-30-2014, 02:47 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by zenmaster - 03-30-2014, 03:55 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by michael430 - 03-30-2014, 06:25 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by zenmaster - 03-30-2014, 06:51 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by 6D longing - 03-31-2014, 12:34 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by zenmaster - 03-31-2014, 02:03 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by zenmaster - 03-30-2014, 04:57 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by michael430 - 03-30-2014, 09:06 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Plenum - 03-31-2014, 02:43 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by 6D longing - 03-31-2014, 04:04 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by isis - 03-31-2014, 11:11 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Fang - 03-31-2014, 04:37 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by spero - 03-31-2014, 05:15 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Fang - 03-31-2014, 10:47 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by zenmaster - 03-31-2014, 12:39 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Steppingfeet - 04-02-2014, 04:40 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Fang - 04-03-2014, 07:02 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Steppingfeet - 04-08-2014, 11:08 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by AnthroHeart - 04-08-2014, 11:26 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by zenmaster - 04-09-2014, 12:33 AM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode