Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Community Art, Media, & Entertainment a bit of love for Scott Mandelker

    Thread: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker


    Fang

    Guest
     
    #34
    03-31-2014, 04:37 AM
    Quote:Of course, the double-bodied or dual-activated entities are native to 4D,and being here incarnate, can surely be deemed "wanderers."

    "surely"? Because Ra said "Not wanderers in the sense of..."?

    Wanderers and dual activated are two different things. Apples and oranges are both fruit but that doesn't mean they are the same thing. Transplants are not wanderers. Those who were harvested in the second cycle and stayed here are not wanderers. Wanderers are those who come back to repeat third density after already progressing through the higher densities, whereas dual activated are still on a linear path of progression. To to put them together based on a vague allusion seems a bit pointless and false. What is the point of seeing dual activated peeps as wanderers? Especially given that it is not the impression given to the vast majority of people familiar with the Ra Material I'm genuinely curious.

    Also, you do realize that things like this:
    http://www.scottmandelker.com/Articles/etquiz.html
    Is based on little more than free association as to what would qualify one as a wanderer?

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Plenum - 05-27-2013, 04:44 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Jerome - 05-28-2013, 05:06 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Spaced - 05-28-2013, 05:10 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by marielle - 05-28-2013, 09:45 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by BrownEye - 06-27-2013, 09:06 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by βαθμιαίος - 05-28-2013, 05:34 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Aloneness - 05-29-2013, 11:19 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Aloneness - 05-29-2013, 01:18 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by reeay - 05-29-2013, 01:46 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Plenum - 05-29-2013, 03:33 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by reeay - 05-29-2013, 04:57 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Plenum - 06-26-2013, 11:01 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Jeremy - 06-26-2013, 11:19 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by jivatman - 10-30-2013, 12:49 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Plenum - 10-30-2013, 04:08 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by isis - 10-30-2013, 11:58 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Plenum - 10-30-2013, 01:57 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by isis - 10-30-2013, 02:13 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Plenum - 10-30-2013, 02:55 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Plenum - 01-25-2014, 12:19 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by βαθμιαίος - 01-26-2014, 10:47 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Plenum - 03-29-2014, 05:42 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by reeay - 03-29-2014, 06:06 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by AnthroHeart - 03-30-2014, 02:47 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by zenmaster - 03-30-2014, 03:55 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by michael430 - 03-30-2014, 06:25 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by zenmaster - 03-30-2014, 06:51 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by 6D longing - 03-31-2014, 12:34 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by zenmaster - 03-31-2014, 02:03 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by zenmaster - 03-30-2014, 04:57 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by michael430 - 03-30-2014, 09:06 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Plenum - 03-31-2014, 02:43 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by 6D longing - 03-31-2014, 04:04 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by isis - 03-31-2014, 11:11 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Fang - 03-31-2014, 04:37 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by spero - 03-31-2014, 05:15 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Fang - 03-31-2014, 10:47 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by zenmaster - 03-31-2014, 12:39 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Steppingfeet - 04-02-2014, 04:40 PM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Fang - 04-03-2014, 07:02 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by Steppingfeet - 04-08-2014, 11:08 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by AnthroHeart - 04-08-2014, 11:26 AM
    RE: a bit of love for Scott Mandelker - by zenmaster - 04-09-2014, 12:33 AM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode