The difference between 'guiding' and 'teaching'

[xise]

I understand the mechanics but I don't understand how that's applicable during any kind of social interaction, other than repression.

/To clarify, in the grand scheme of things, sure. And I don't mean it in a sense to consistently act upon it, but in the moment of having a conversation I can't help but think of something as wrong/right etc. And I'm quite ok with it too. Otherwise we wouldn't have anything left to talk about.

No right or wrong in a moral sense per Ra:

1.7 Questioner: [The question was lost because the questioner was sitting too far from the tape recorder to be recorded.]

Ra: I am Ra. Consider, if you will, that the universe is infinite. This has yet to be proven or disproven, but we can assure you that there is no end to your selves, your understanding, what you would call your journey of seeking, or your perceptions of the creation.

That which is infinite cannot be many, for many-ness is a finite concept. To have infinity you must identify or define that infinity as unity; otherwise, the term does not have any referent or meaning. In an Infinite Creator there is only unity. You have seen simple examples of unity. You have seen the prism which shows all colors stemming from the sunlight. This is a simplistic example of unity.

In truth there is no right or wrong. There is no polarity for all will be, as you would say, reconciled at some point in your dance through the mind/body/spirit complex which you amuse yourself by distorting in various ways at this time. This distortion is not in any case necessary. It is chosen by each of you as an alternative to understanding the complete unity of thought which binds all things. You are not speaking of similar or somewhat like entities or things. You are every thing, every being, every emotion, every event, every situation. You are unity. You are infinity. You are love/light, light/love. You are. This is the Law of One.

No right or wrong in a factual, physical sense because every single statement about the external world is probabilistic in nature. There is no such thing as 100%. Senses can be wrong, etc, etc. There's a ton of discussion in epistemology (philosophy) on this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemology

There can be right or wrong in a limited sense within definitions of concepts, but it's more about how you define things and whether definitions are internally consistent. Ie defining love as not including acceptance is not internally consistent - you could say wrong but it's hard to argue about overt definitions since any definition can be created subjectively. I think this is the closest you can get to something being right or wrong, but this usually seldom comes up in overt real life social interactions.

At the end of the day, you really don't need the categories of right and wrong to think about the world or make decisions. Although, to be fair, I am a philosophy major so I do think about the world in different ways.