05-07-2014, 02:42 AM
Yep, but not every planet or sub-Logos moves in to full activation of consciousness through all the densities. For example, the planet which Ra mentions which is apparently "locked" in first density (although I think conscious interference could change that, although perhaps at the cost of positive polarity to the social memory complex if the methods were intrusive).
What does this mean? In my opinion it means that there are no space/time incarnations occurring on/in that sub-sub-Logoic space/time and rather the sub-sub-Logos is having an experience of barrenness through third density. So perhaps it's not that the densities are not there, but rather that they are not actively "populated" by entities of a particular density of consciousness and instead the sub-sub-Logos' planetary sphere is then put to other purposes such as may be necessary to express the sub-Logos' (the Sun/Star) and further Logos' (Galaxy) design or thought.
What does this mean? In my opinion it means that there are no space/time incarnations occurring on/in that sub-sub-Logoic space/time and rather the sub-sub-Logos is having an experience of barrenness through third density. So perhaps it's not that the densities are not there, but rather that they are not actively "populated" by entities of a particular density of consciousness and instead the sub-sub-Logos' planetary sphere is then put to other purposes such as may be necessary to express the sub-Logos' (the Sun/Star) and further Logos' (Galaxy) design or thought.