05-08-2014, 05:28 PM
(05-08-2014, 10:09 AM)Bring4th_GLB Wrote:(05-07-2014, 05:31 PM)reeay Wrote: So am wondering whether the catalyst that comes with our desires thru our interactions with other people & society is what makes learning more efficient in 3D. Ra said we have a shorter lifespan on 3D so we do need catalyst e.g., this sense of separation and conflicts.
(Bold is my own.)
reeay, is "efficient" a word that applies? Not that I'm terribly consciously familiar with other third-density experiences (read: zero familiarity with other experiences), but our own third-density experience exhibits system-wide inefficient use of catalyst, and therefore inefficient learning.
Maybe our multitude of desires (exercises in confusion though they may often be) creates not a more effecient experience per se, but rather a more catalytic third-density experience; one that tends to motivate/accelerate growth and the development and will and faith.
Just riffing on your good post.
Yeah maybe efficient might not be the best word as it is for something like polarization being efficient, etc. What I meant was without catalyst that comes from our desires and our choices and whatnot, we'd be bored as hell and having less opportunities for growth when we have little time here on 3D. Yep more catalystic.

