05-08-2014, 10:19 PM
(05-08-2014, 10:15 PM)Adonai One Wrote:(05-08-2014, 10:13 PM)Tanner Wrote:(05-08-2014, 10:10 PM)Adonai One Wrote:(05-08-2014, 10:05 PM)Tanner Wrote:Because this is who I am now and I accept my desires in this regard. They are perhaps attached but I would be happy with any result, even if the world became what I didn't desire.(05-08-2014, 10:01 PM)Adonai One Wrote: Oneness by separation is indefinite separation. This kind of oneness is illusory and is based on indefinite self-denial by lawful decree.
Conformity is oneness by assimilation. Assimilation is not my ideal of unity.
Unity is inherent even in assimilation. My ideal of unity is seeing as it exists now, not when the world has reached a utopic ideal.
So then why do you seem to have an issue with all the 'rules' if your ideal already currently exists? If your philosophy is that all is to be accepted and all is good and everything is perfect, then why are you having thoughts of opposition or adversarial-ism?
It seems your ideal of unity is exclusive, which, to me, is very separative.
Simply, it does not appear to me that you are practicing what you are preaching.
I am not absolute. I simply allow myself to express emotion without suppression.
I prefer acceptance of all things to a great deal of measure. That entails I will not force people in my ideal but I surely will express it.
I practice my philosophy by not hurting others nor convicting myself towards an absolute end. That is how I practice detachment and I am doing well in that regard. The fact I express myself without suppression shows that I am practicing this quite well.
I genuinely feel everything is in unity in this moment, even if this world was under total tyranny but I certainly would not prefer it.
So, you do indeed have a preference as to the way things are structured?
But I do not believe it is true. I am an Ironist.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ironism
I don't get what you mean by you don't believe it is true. As in you don't believe in your own preference?