(05-13-2014, 09:33 PM)Fang Wrote: You are assuming that they did not. What happened last time you tried to correct me? You were incorrect due to a fundamental mistaken assumption.
What a horrible attitude. You certainly do go for the offensive.
My last correction was, well, correct. Kale is more protein dense than beef per calorie. You made the point that you'd prefer to use mass as the standard, rather than caloric value. This is odd, as the body derives energy from caloric value, not mass.
Nutrition is a science, and except for certain disorders, the human body needs what the human body needs. This is why it's impossible to say conclusively the body needs meat, just as it's impossible to say omitting meat is superior. What the science of nutrition does tell us is that the body needs certain macronutrients and micronutrients - it's up to us to decide how our body gets those nutrients, and if the wealth of anecdotal evidence in favor of a plant-based diet promoting better health resonates with us.
As long as you're seeing 3rd density experience as a battle, with arguments to be won, and using such hostility when gentle corrections would suffice, you're rather missing out on the entire opportunity to polarize green ray positive and learn universal love.