"The experience of no need to find the necessary emolument."

[xise]

Alright it seems there is a significant miscommunication here... When I wrote to you last night Icipher, what I meant, and I will repeat for the second time, is that Adonai One tends to play around and exaggerate sometimes in his posts. I PMed you because you seemed to take his posts very literally when they were simply meant to be taken in jest. He doesn't truly believe there is only a void. I was hoping to dissipate some confusion and ended up creating more, ha... He is not trolling, simply talking in extremes to be humorous and cause reflection, thinking. He was well aware I wrote you.

I haven't read this entire thread, so I can't comment on what's going on in this thread.

But in reference to what vervex is talking about here - "talking in extremes to ... cause reflection" reminds me of playing devil's advocate - a method I find very useful in analyzing a particular thought or concept.

Wikipedia - Devil's Advocate:

In common parlance, a devil's advocate is someone who, given a certain argument, takes a position they do not necessarily agree with (or simply an alternative position from the accepted norm), for the sake of debate or to explore the thought further. In taking this position, the individual taking on the devil's advocate role seeks to engage others in an argumentative discussion process. The purpose of such a process is typically to test the quality of the original argument and identify weaknesses in its structure, and to use such information to either improve or abandon the original, opposing position. It can also refer to someone who takes a stance that is seen as unpopular or unconventional, but is actually another way of arguing a much more conventional stance.