Here we go again (wikipedia)

[xise]

There is only one source that was remotely reliable but it is insignificant in coverage in my rightful discretion as an editor. All were removed except a citation of the actual Law of One book. People are free to utilize that only, miniscule reliable source to add information to the article.

You didn't answer how many sources you removed.


The reverted page has 38 sources so I'm guessing you removed 37 of 38 sources.


I have trouble believing you were able to thoroughly investigate 37 of those 38 sources to such an extent that you were able to determine that the they all should be immediately removed for unreliability.