Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Community Olio Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100

    Thread: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100


    Unbound

    Guest
     
    #22
    07-02-2014, 08:38 PM
    If you ask me, I think in the previous octave happiness would have been the main goal because the basis for polarity was just the mover and the moved, so achieving bliss as a result of balanced movement and relationships between movements would create patterns of harmony resulting in greater bliss. Maybe that's why you conceive of things that way, you could be connected to the previous octave. I see that in this octave the bliss is actually secondary to the creation of the harmony/disharmony that the bliss stems from. It is through the patterning of will illusions that patterns are created in relation to others either towards total dominance of one individual's bliss, or a unison of bliss sharing.

    The octaves are cycles in the Creator knowing itself. The last octave I believe the Creator came to know the intimacy of its own bliss through movement, but in this octave the Creator is coming to know the interactions between those blisses established in the previous octave. One might think that the next octave will just be a greater experience of bliss, but I actually believe that the octave cycle is meant to transform the One Thought in to a new Concept of Infinity so while the last octave turned something, perhaps the polarity of potential/kinetic (awareness cycle), in to the idea of the mover and the moved (observation cycle), and now in to service to other and service to self (interaction cycle), I think a new concept is waiting to be born, or has already begun its birth.

    Bliss, to me, is the carrot on the stick.
    [+] The following 4 members thanked thanked for this post:4 members thanked for this post
      • xise, Adonai One, Parsons, Infinite Unity
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-02-2014, 05:35 PM
    RE: Convince me that polarizing and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-02-2014, 05:37 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-02-2014, 05:41 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-02-2014, 05:45 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-02-2014, 05:47 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-02-2014, 05:50 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-02-2014, 05:53 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-02-2014, 05:58 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-02-2014, 06:01 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-02-2014, 06:09 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-02-2014, 06:12 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-02-2014, 06:16 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-02-2014, 06:19 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-02-2014, 06:21 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Spaced - 07-02-2014, 06:27 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by reeay - 07-02-2014, 06:47 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by michael430 - 07-02-2014, 06:53 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-02-2014, 07:01 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by michael430 - 07-02-2014, 07:14 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-02-2014, 07:18 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness - by xise - 07-02-2014, 08:28 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by GentleReckoning - 07-03-2014, 02:23 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-02-2014, 08:38 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by native - 07-02-2014, 09:42 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-02-2014, 10:38 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Spaced - 07-02-2014, 11:30 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-03-2014, 12:06 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-02-2014, 11:56 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by vervex - 07-03-2014, 12:14 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Spaced - 07-03-2014, 12:21 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by vervex - 07-03-2014, 12:35 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Spaced - 07-03-2014, 12:39 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-03-2014, 12:19 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-03-2014, 12:21 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-03-2014, 12:44 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Spaced - 07-03-2014, 01:09 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by xise - 07-03-2014, 01:13 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-03-2014, 01:49 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Spaced - 07-03-2014, 09:02 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-03-2014, 04:34 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Hotsizzle77 - 07-03-2014, 07:15 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Karl - 07-03-2014, 09:18 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Phoenix - 07-03-2014, 09:36 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-03-2014, 03:15 PM
    Polarization - by anagogy - 07-03-2014, 03:40 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-03-2014, 11:51 PM
    infinity - by anagogy - 07-04-2014, 12:31 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-04-2014, 12:53 AM
    infinity - by anagogy - 07-04-2014, 01:06 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-04-2014, 01:53 AM
    infinity - by anagogy - 07-04-2014, 09:53 PM
    RE: - by BrownEye - 07-04-2014, 11:25 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Unbound - 07-04-2014, 05:11 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-04-2014, 06:06 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Spaced - 07-04-2014, 09:54 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-04-2014, 09:57 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Bring4th_Austin - 07-04-2014, 03:50 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness - by native - 07-04-2014, 03:30 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by ChickenInSpace - 07-04-2014, 03:42 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by reeay - 07-04-2014, 05:23 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for - by Horuseus - 07-04-2014, 05:47 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-04-2014, 05:51 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for - by Horuseus - 07-04-2014, 06:10 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-05-2014, 12:13 AM
    identity - by anagogy - 07-05-2014, 01:31 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-05-2014, 01:32 AM
    identity - by anagogy - 07-05-2014, 01:44 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by vervex - 07-06-2014, 12:00 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-06-2014, 12:02 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by vervex - 07-06-2014, 12:11 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-06-2014, 12:11 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by vervex - 07-06-2014, 12:13 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Adonai One - 07-06-2014, 12:13 AM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by Lorna - 07-06-2014, 07:32 PM
    RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - by AnthroHeart - 07-06-2014, 08:15 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode