Law of One Advanced Teachings and The Mind

[unity100]

However.....at first glance, I don't really see the connection between these ideas you have written and my request for an interpretation of that specific Ra quote -- where Ra seemed to be advising Wanderers against Karmic entanglement and then explaining that one can become karmically involved by acting in a consciously unloving fashion in concert with other beings. That little section in and of itself seems to imply, to me at least, that participation in armed conflict is not advisable for a Wanderer. It also seems to imply, (again, to me) that conversely ACTING in a consciously LOVING fashion is recommended for Wanderers.

the point is simple.

none of the entities mentioned above are acting without love. they are acting with the green ray vibration being present in their vibration spectrum. (provided that their position is one of a higher density). yet, they are allowing killings, deaths, exploitations, abuses, and even more. some, are planning such events, as higher selves or others.

notice that what Ra said there doesnt involve any particular action, but notes down the prerequisite for karmic involvement as acting unloving.

therefore, if you kill an individual, by accepting that individual fully, and viewing it as an integral part of existence of us all, will it be a karmic involvement ?

is a vet who puts an animal to sleep (most can be 3d entities, due to investment), getting karmically involved ?

is a doctor, who performs euthanasia on a patient, getting karmically involved ?

and even a greater question - lets say that one is in a position that s/he can save millions from nuclear destruction by killing an individual that is going to initiate a nuclear device. will s/he get karmically involved by killing that individual ?

what does s/he do ?

does s/he refrain from killing that individual and saving millions from a catastrophic death, or, does s/he kill that individual and do the otherwise ?

but, since this is a huge affair, is it possible that, this event might have been planned to happen and s/he may disrupt the flow of fate and put it in a different flow, by killing the individual ?

or, since s/he is already there, and in a position to prevent it, does it mean that this event is designed to be preventable ? and will s/he fail by not preventing it ?

..........

at this point we should remember that the guardians, confederation members existing then, allowed the maldek entities destroy their planet, and devolve into a tangle of fear of consciousness. were they acting out of love, or where they acting without love ?

However, the heart of your proposal seems to be that there is a different standard or set of behaviors/ethics that is distinct for Wanderers. Indeed that Wanderers should focus on things beyond purely Love and positive polarity. Now, I don't mean to put words in your mouth, that is merely my interpretation of what I have heard you say recently.

as far as i know, the laws of existence acts as the same for all entities, and all are responsible for their actions regardless.

yet, there may be more responsibility for wanderers in that, they are of higher densities, hence know more, also can vibrate in higher frequencies, and therefore these, according to law of responsibility, may bring more responsibilities for them.