(07-03-2014, 11:17 AM)michael430 Wrote:Quote:Questioner: I am assuming that it is not necessary for an individual to understand the Law of One to go from the third to the fourth density. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. It is absolutely necessary that an entity consciously realize it does not understand in order for it to be harvestable. Understanding is not of this density.
Questioner: That is a very important point. I used the wrong word. What I meant to say was that I believed that it was not necessary for an entity to be consciously aware of the Law of One to go from the third to the fourth density.
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.
Why offer any teaching if your students aren't to understand it? Why didn't Ra open the entire contact with : "You must not understand any of this in order for our plan to increase harvest to work" ?
What I don't understand is why can't or shouldn't I understand ? It makes it really hard to take anything from any of the Material sometimes.
we don't understand - if we want to be "harvestable"? assuming it's possble, is this "understanding" really something we can control? to experience something is typically to understand it
even tho' the Ra say this isn't the density "of" understanding, they definitely make it seem like it can/does happen here w/ "you must not understand any of this in order for our plan (to increase harvest) to work"
why would the plan not work if we understand? or are they saying the plan to increase harvest will work bc we're in a density where full (top-level) understanding is impossible?