07-31-2014, 04:56 PM
(07-31-2014, 04:48 PM)Adonai One Wrote: Yes, humans often do control each other when they have differing desires when they refuse to acknowledge the other and refuse to attempt to reach a consensus. The positive polarizing entity, in my view, will treat every person's desires as their own and avoid contradiction as much as possible. That's my point.
When you see the creator in everything, in my view, it is inherently depolarizing to act against somebody even if you are just trying to accept yourself.
It is not about intentional or unintentional force when you take somebody somewhere they don't want to go: You are still acting against them and responsibility is required if the person is to be considered and loved.
Well then every action ever is depolarizing because there are inevitably others who will be perpendicular in desire to yourself. Does this apply in just a local context? When you say "every person", I presume you do not mean every person literally but every person relevant to whatever situation is occurring.
Does that then suggest that people always know what's best for themselves and that you should never in any way try to help people as anything that is offered but is not asked for is controlling?
Sup rugged individualism. Everyone for themselves!
I get what you are implying philosophically, I get the idea, but I don't see the practical use or application of the idea. I understand seeking balance and fulfillment of all desires but I don't understand the sense that you tie that to polarity. With your description I don't know how anybody could ever polarize ever because it's a zero-sum game, a complete loss of activity.